TLDR USD1 proposal passed as top wallets dominated WLFI governance votes Locked WLFI holders were excluded from a vote shaping protocol direction Nine wallets controlledTLDR USD1 proposal passed as top wallets dominated WLFI governance votes Locked WLFI holders were excluded from a vote shaping protocol direction Nine wallets controlled

USD1 Growth Proposal Triggers Claims of WLFI Value Extraction

TLDR

  • USD1 proposal passed as top wallets dominated WLFI governance votes
  • Locked WLFI holders were excluded from a vote shaping protocol direction
  • Nine wallets controlled nearly 59% of total voting power
  • Revenue flows bypass WLFI holders as USD1 expansion accelerates
  • Rising emissions and dilution fears pressure WLFI market outlook

World Liberty Financial faced renewed scrutiny after the USD1 proposal passed through governance despite restricted participation. The vote advanced while many WLFI holders remained unable to access locked tokens. Critics argued that USD1 now sits at the center of decisions that reduce token holder influence.

USD1 Proposal Advances Despite Voting Access Concerns

The governance outcome pushed the USD1 plan forward and highlighted the voting imbalance within the WLFI structure. The largest wallets cast decisive votes and shifted the final tally with concentrated power. Furthermore, onchain data suggested that team-linked and partner-linked wallets controlled most voting weight.

The top nine wallets accounted for nearly 59% of total power and secured the USD1 proposal’s approval. They shaped the final outcome and overshadowed the votes of smaller participants.  The largest wallet represented more than 18% of the voting snapshot.

Many WLFI holders stayed locked since the token generation event and could not participate. Their allocations remained inaccessible and restricted by project rules. Critics argued that these holders could not influence decisions affecting USD1 expansion.

USD1 Plan Raises New Questions About WLFI Token Utility

The USD1 roadmap increased concerns about WLFI’s benefits and long-term structure. Critics questioned why governance advanced USD1 growth instead of prioritizing unlock mechanisms for WLFI. They argued that USD1 incentives could draw from treasury assets rather than WLFI emissions.

Background documents indicated that revenue distribution excludes WLFI holders completely. The Gold Paper stated that protocol revenue flows to Trump-linked and Witkoff-linked entities. Thus, attention turned to whether the USD1 proposal strengthens internal interests rather than WLFI’s ecosystem.

WLFI holds a treasury of major digital assets including Bitcoin, Ether, and Chainlink. These assets have grown under previous strategies and remain controlled by the project. WLFI holders gain no direct participation from these reserves, which fueled frustration around the USD1 expansion.

USD1 Expansion Follows Fresh Token Movements and Growing Emissions

Large transfers occurred after the vote and signaled new activity around WLFI circulation. A transaction of 500 million WLFI moved to Jump Trading and intensified debate around emissions. Critics stated that locked holders still lacked clarity about future access to their tokens.

WLFI allocated 33.5% of supply to the team and 5.85% to partners. These groups secured significant influence in governance and shaped USD1 alignment strategies. The public sale accounted for a smaller share and held limited voting impact.

The market reacted to increasing WLFI emissions and ongoing USD1 expansion efforts. Participants expressed concern about long-term dilution and structural extraction claims. As a result, projections suggested continued downward pressure on WLFI as the USD1 agenda advances.

The post USD1 Growth Proposal Triggers Claims of WLFI Value Extraction appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
WLFI Logo
WLFI Price(WLFI)
$0.1619
$0.1619$0.1619
-2.41%
USD
WLFI (WLFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37