The post SynapLogic Statement Amid Suspicious 144k $SPY Token Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What to know Around 144K SYP tokens were minted through The post SynapLogic Statement Amid Suspicious 144k $SPY Token Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What to know Around 144K SYP tokens were minted through

SynapLogic Statement Amid Suspicious 144k $SPY Token Hack

A series of suspicious transactions involving SynapLogic has recently been detected on the Base network, raising concerns across the community. According to on-chain monitoring systems, an attacker was able to acquire around 144,000 SYP tokens through unusual activity. While the situation sounded alarming at first, the SynapLogic team has confirmed that the issue has now been fully resolved and that all user funds remain safe.

What Happened?

The activity was first flagged when several linked transactions showed abnormal behavior. The attacker’s wallet was originally funded through Tornado Cash on the Ethereum network. From there, the funds were moved to the Base network using a bridge service. Once on Base, the attacker carried out multiple transactions that resulted in the minting of roughly 144,000 SYP tokens. Importantly, even though the tokens were created, they were not sold or swapped on the market. The funds remain locked inside the attacker’s contract, which helped limit the damage and avoid sudden price impact for regular users.

Early analysis suggests that the problem did not come from stolen private keys or a hack in the traditional sense. Instead, the issue appears to be caused by a business logic fault in the token purchase system. When users bought SYP tokens using ETH or USDC, the system allowed them to enter a list of referral addresses. Each referral address could receive 10% of the user’s spending as a reward. However, the contract did not properly check this input.

The attacker exploited this by setting the referral list to their own address repeated many times. In one case, the attacker listed themselves 31 times, allowing them to receive about 310% of the amount spent. This drained funds from the purchasing contract, with the estimated loss coming to around $88,000.

Why the attacker couldn’t cash out

Even though a large number of SYP tokens were minted, the attacker was unable to freely move or sell them. This is because SYP balances are split into two parts: vesting tokens and exchange tokens. Vesting tokens are locked and cannot be transferred or sold until certain conditions are met. The attacker’s newly minted SYP fell into this locked category. As a result, the tokens could not be dumped on the market, which helped protect other holders.

Later, another attacker attempted a similar trick by listing their own address fewer times so they would not need to pay anything at all. Once again, the tokens were minted but remained unsold due to the same restrictions. Security monitors also reported 193 suspicious transactions linked to an unverified contract connected to SynapLogic. In these transactions, attackers repeatedly used flash-loaned funds to mint around 16,000 SYP per attempt, then returned the borrowed ETH immediately after. The function used in these calls lacked proper checks on incoming parameters, allowing attackers to receive more value than expected. While this sounds serious, most of the activity was contained, and the contract has since been paused.

Final Thoughts

SynapLogic acted quickly once the issue was identified. The affected contract was paused, and fixes were applied to prevent the same behavior in the future.

In a public statement, the team said, “The issue has been fully resolved. SynapLogic systems are now operating normally, and all user funds remain completely safe. We remain committed to transparency, security, and putting our community first.”

This incident is a reminder that even small logic oversights can lead to big problems in smart contracts. While no user funds were lost and the tokens were not sold, the event highlights the importance of careful testing and monitoring. For now, SynapLogic appears to be back to normal operations, and users have been reassured that their assets were never at risk. As always in crypto, staying informed and cautious remains key.

Also Read: New York Stock Exchange to Launch Tokenized Securities Platform

Source: https://www.cryptonewsz.com/synaplogic-statement-144k-syp-base-transaction/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005237
$0.0005237$0.0005237
-2.29%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37