TLDR Hong Kong is set to issue its first stablecoin issuer licences in the first quarter of 2026. The stablecoin licensing framework includes strict rules on reserveTLDR Hong Kong is set to issue its first stablecoin issuer licences in the first quarter of 2026. The stablecoin licensing framework includes strict rules on reserve

Hong Kong Push for Stablecoin Issuers in Q1: What’s at Stake?

TLDR

  • Hong Kong is set to issue its first stablecoin issuer licences in the first quarter of 2026.
  • The stablecoin licensing framework includes strict rules on reserve backing, redemption rights, governance, and risk management.
  • Paul Chan confirmed that the new licensing regime is part of Hong Kong’s strategy to strengthen its digital asset ecosystem.
  • Eleven virtual asset trading platforms have already received licenses under Hong Kong’s regulatory framework.
  • The Hong Kong Monetary Authority launched a pilot program to test tokenized deposits and digital assets in November 2025.

Hong Kong is preparing to issue its first batch of stablecoin issuer licences in the first quarter of the year. This move is part of the city’s broader efforts to establish itself as a regional hub for digital assets. The Hong Kong Financial Secretary, Paul Chan, confirmed the stablecoin licensing regime and the upcoming issuance of licences.

Hong Kong’s Strategic Approach to Digital Finance

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Paul Chan emphasized that Hong Kong’s approach to crypto regulation remains “responsible and sustainable.” He stressed that the city aims to build a full digital asset ecosystem, which includes regulated stablecoin issuance, licensed trading platforms, and tokenized financial products. Chan explained that this move is part of the city’s strategy to secure its position as a global financial center.

The stablecoin licensing framework, introduced in 2025, includes strict requirements for fiat-backed stablecoin issuers. These regulations cover aspects like reserve backing, redemption rights, governance, and risk management. Chan highlighted that these rules are designed to ensure financial stability and consumer protection in the wake of global market volatility.

Hong Kong has already implemented an active framework for virtual asset trading platforms. Under the supervision of the Securities and Futures Commission, 11 virtual asset trading platforms have received licenses. These approved operators include OSL, HashKey, and Bullish, all of which comply with the city’s strict regulatory standards.

Alongside stablecoin regulation, Hong Kong is pursuing deeper tokenization efforts. In November 2025, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) launched a pilot program under Project Ensemble. The initiative involves testing real-value transactions using tokenized deposits and digital assets with the participation of major banks and asset managers.

Concerns Over Virtual Asset Management Rules

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association raised concerns about the proposed tightening of virtual asset management rules. They warned that stricter compliance requirements could deter traditional asset managers from entering the market. Specifically, they objected to the removal of the long-standing “de minimis” exemption, which allows limited crypto exposure without triggering additional licensing obligations.

These regulatory changes come as Hong Kong continues to push forward with its broader tokenization agenda. In addition to stablecoins, the city is consulting on proposals to introduce new licensing regimes for crypto asset dealing, advisory, and management services. The authorities are seeking public feedback on how best to balance innovation with regulatory oversight.

Despite the concerns from industry professionals, Hong Kong’s regulators are moving forward with their plans. They are determined to maintain the city’s competitiveness in the fast-evolving digital finance space.

The post Hong Kong Push for Stablecoin Issuers in Q1: What’s at Stake? appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

  Introduction to Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) We present the definitive guide to the Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) — a cutting-edge cryptocurrency mining
Share
Techbullion2026/01/22 12:27
Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

The post Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects: Solana Founder
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 11:49