The post Circle Launches Crosschain Forwarding Service for CCTP Integration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Luisa Crawford Jan 22, 2026 13:36 Circle’s The post Circle Launches Crosschain Forwarding Service for CCTP Integration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Luisa Crawford Jan 22, 2026 13:36 Circle’s

Circle Launches Crosschain Forwarding Service for CCTP Integration



Luisa Crawford
Jan 22, 2026 13:36

Circle’s new forwarding service eliminates manual attestation fetching for USDC transfers, cutting crosschain transfer times by up to 50-200% across 14 chains.

Circle has rolled out a crosschain forwarding service integrated directly into its Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol, eliminating one of the biggest pain points for developers building multichain applications. The service handles attestation fetching, destination chain transactions, and gas management automatically—tasks that previously required significant infrastructure investment.

The forwarding service launches with support for 14 chains: Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Ethereum, HyperEVM, Ink, Linea, Monad, OP Mainnet, Polygon PoS, Sei, Sonic, Unichain, and World Chain. Circle plans to expand coverage across all CCTP-enabled routes by the end of H1 2026.

What Actually Changes

Here’s the technical shift: developers previously had to burn USDC on the source chain, then separately fetch attestations from Circle, submit mint transactions on the destination chain, and manage gas wallets across every network. That’s a lot of moving parts that can break.

The new service handles all of this. Developers specify forwarding instructions using existing hookData and maxFee parameters during the burn transaction. Circle’s infrastructure validates the request, signs the attestation, and broadcasts the destination mint. Fees come directly from the minted USDC—users don’t need destination chain gas.

According to Circle, inefficient attestation fetching typically adds 50-200% to total transfer times. The forwarding service removes that bottleneck entirely.

Already Powering Hyperliquid

This isn’t theoretical. The forwarding service is already live for Hyperliquid users, enabling one-click USDC deposits from any CCTP-enabled chain to Hyperliquid’s orderbook DEX. No attestation fetching, no manual minting on HyperEVM.

The service also works with Circle xReserve, allowing blockchain teams to automatically mint USDC-backed stablecoins on destination chains for their users.

The Developer Trade-off Problem

Crosschain execution has forced teams into uncomfortable choices. Option one: run your own infrastructure across every chain you support, managing RPC access, monitoring, gas funding, and retry logic. Option two: integrate third-party services with different APIs, trust assumptions, and failure modes that complicate debugging.

Circle’s positioning this as a first-party alternative that sits within their existing interop stack. No new contracts to deploy, no additional trust assumptions beyond Circle itself.

Broader Context

This launch builds on recent CCTP momentum. CCTP V2 became the canonical version in November 2025, with V1 scheduled for phase-out starting July 31, 2026. Circle’s January 2026 report highlighted the protocol’s role in what they’re calling the “Internet Financial System.”

The forwarding service is available now on testnet. Developers can join Circle’s Early Access Program for priority mainnet access. Integration with Bridge Kit and Circle Gateway is planned for H1 2026.

For teams already running CCTP integrations, this represents a potential infrastructure cost reduction. For those evaluating crosschain solutions, it removes one of the bigger operational headaches in the space.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source: https://blockchain.news/news/circle-launches-crosschain-forwarding-service-cctp-integration

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00