CNN's White House Correspondent Kristen Holmes thinks that the White House has "lost the plot." On Friday, Dana Bashnplayed conflicting statements in which JD VanceCNN's White House Correspondent Kristen Holmes thinks that the White House has "lost the plot." On Friday, Dana Bashnplayed conflicting statements in which JD Vance

Brutal CNN supercut catches Trump’s VP in 'absurd' lie — using his own words

CNN's White House Correspondent Kristen Holmes thinks that the White House has "lost the plot."

On Friday, Dana Bashnplayed conflicting statements in which JD Vance appears to have changed his story. Bash suggested it might be gaslighting.

On Jan. 7, Vance spoke at a White House press conference, where he said, "You have a federal law enforcement official engaged in federal law enforcement action. That's a federal issue. That guy is protected by absolute immunity."

When speaking to those on the ground in Minnesota, however, Vance denied ever saying it.

"No, I didn't say and I don't think any other official within the Trump administration said that officers who engaged in wrongdoing would enjoy immunity. That's absurd," Vance claimed.

Bash also cited an incident in which the Department of Homeland Security appeared to change the face of a woman they said they'd arrested. The photo of her arrest shows her sobbing. When Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted the photo she was no longer crying and lipstick added.

The arrest was for disrupting a church service in protest.

"So these are some examples of how they're trying to seize back the narrative, but doing so with a little bit of gaslighting," said Bash.

Holmes agreed.

"They've lost the plot, and they think that the Americans have lost the plot," she said.

"And so what you see when you see president Trump out there doing his own briefing — which, by the way, he was not scheduled to do, is because President Trump thinks that he's the one who can actually deliver the message when it comes to immigration. Sure, we are hearing some kind of softening of rhetoric going back on what they said. That is not changing the way that this administration is looking at ICE," she continued.

"Look at what President Trump did. Yes, he had a softer language when it came to the woman who was shot multiple times, causing outcry across the country. But when it came to immigration, he held up those mug shots," Holmes said. "He talked about what they were doing. He believes that his message isn't getting across. He also believes he won on immigration. He believes he is the strongest messenger and that people, if they actually understand what ICE is doing, will be come back around to him."

However, she said, the administration doesn't want the photos and videos to be in the public. The incident in Minnesota with a 5-year-old who was taken by ICE while his mother hid in their home is one of many stories they want to change the narrative on, according to Holmes.

"They don't want to change what they're doing, but they don't want that to be the narrative," said Holmes. "They want the narrative to be. Look at what we're doing for immigration, right."

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39