The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a memorandum circular imposing a firm maximum cumulative nine-year term for independent directors (IDs) The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a memorandum circular imposing a firm maximum cumulative nine-year term for independent directors (IDs)

SEC imposes strict 9-year limit for independent directors

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a memorandum circular imposing a firm maximum cumulative nine-year term for independent directors (IDs) of publicly listed companies, effective Feb. 1.

Under Memorandum Circular No. 7, Series of 2026, an ID is elected to a one-year term and may serve for a total of up to nine years in the same company.

IDs elected before the circular’s effectivity will be subject to the same nine-year limit, reckoned from calendar year 2012, unless otherwise provided.

For continuous or consecutive service, the nine-year term limit will end on the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting (ASM) or on another date approved by the SEC.

In cases of intermittent service, total tenure must still not exceed nine years, with the limit in the ninth year ending on the ASM date.

If an ID assumes a non-independent role before reaching the nine-year limit, he or she must observe a two-year cooling-off period before being eligible for re-election as an ID.

Once the nine-year limit is reached, the director will be permanently disqualified from re-election as an independent director in the same company but may serve in other capacities without restriction.

Under the current system, independent directors are formally re-elected at each annual stockholders’ meeting, but their cumulative service is subject to a nine-year cap, although some have been allowed to exceed this limit through exemptive relief.

The new circular removes this flexibility and adopts a stricter, more definitive enforcement of the term cap.

Companies that exceed the maximum cumulative term limit for an ID may face a base penalty of P1 million per violation, plus P30,000 for each month that the director remains in office beyond the allowed term, in addition to other sanctions under existing laws.–Alexandria Grace C. Magno

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Strategic Expansion Unveils New Trading Pair For Global Market

Strategic Expansion Unveils New Trading Pair For Global Market

The post Strategic Expansion Unveils New Trading Pair For Global Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OKX SENT Listing: Strategic Expansion Unveils New Trading
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/27 14:30
Mitsubishi Electric and Landis+Gyr Accelerate Grid Edge Innovation as Mitsubishi Electric Takes Part in Landis+Gyr’s Application Ecosystem

Mitsubishi Electric and Landis+Gyr Accelerate Grid Edge Innovation as Mitsubishi Electric Takes Part in Landis+Gyr’s Application Ecosystem

ATLANTA and TOKYO, Jan. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Landis+Gyr (SIX: LAND) announced today that they have signed a Memorandum of
Share
AI Journal2026/01/27 14:30