TLDR Korea pushes strict crypto exchange ownership caps to boost market trust and stability. New Digital Asset Act reshapes governance, licensing, and sector-wideTLDR Korea pushes strict crypto exchange ownership caps to boost market trust and stability. New Digital Asset Act reshapes governance, licensing, and sector-wide

South Korea Plans 15–20% Ownership Cap for Crypto Exchanges Under New Digital Asset Act

2026/01/28 21:43
3 min read

TLDR

  • Korea pushes strict crypto exchange ownership caps to boost market trust and stability.
  • New Digital Asset Act reshapes governance, licensing, and sector-wide oversight.
  • Stablecoin issuers face higher capital rules under Korea’s evolving crypto law.
  • Regulators aim to curb concentrated control and strengthen crypto market integrity.
  • Lawmakers race to finalize sweeping crypto reforms before Lunar New Year deadline.

South Korea advanced its Digital Asset Act as regulators signaled firm support for ownership caps on major shareholders of domestic crypto exchanges. The proposal gained momentum as policymakers linked governance reforms to the growing role of digital asset platforms. The plan also aligned with wider efforts to strengthen oversight across the expanding virtual asset sector.

Regulator Pushes Forward With Exchange Ownership Limits

South Korea’s financial regulator moved to establish a 15–20% ownership cap for key shareholders under the Digital Asset Act. The Financial Services Commission reviewed the measure and argued that concentrated control could weaken market integrity. The agency also emphasized that crypto exchanges now operate as critical market infrastructure.

The FSC signaled that the new authorization regime under the Digital Asset Act would grant exchanges lasting operating status. This shift increased demands for stronger governance rules and clearer standards for shareholder suitability. Regulators positioned the ownership limit as a structural safeguard for long-term stability.

Domestic exchanges raised objections as they assessed the impact on existing ownership structures. Several operators hold larger stakes that exceed the proposed ceiling, and restructuring may become necessary. The regulator acknowledged the industry pushback but maintained that comparative rules already exist in securities markets.

Political Debate Continues as Lawmakers Shape Final Bill

Lawmakers continued to refine the Digital Asset Act as they balanced regulatory objectives with market concerns. The ruling Democratic Party reviewed the ownership cap and questioned its global alignment. Discussions remained active because officials viewed governance oversight as a central theme of the legislation.

The party prepared to submit the Digital Asset Act before the Lunar New Year deadline. Transitioning crypto exchanges from a renewal system to an authorization framework remained a key feature of the bill. The proposal strengthened supervisory powers and defined new approval thresholds for high-risk digital asset businesses.

The Digital Asset Act introduced eight categories of digital asset firms, including custodial and wallet services. High-risk segments required authorization, while others faced simplified registration. This structure aimed to set clear boundaries and reduce regulatory ambiguity across the digital asset market.

Stablecoin Requirements and Oversight Structure Also Advance

The Digital Asset Act also proposed a minimum capital requirement of 5 billion won for stablecoin issuers. Lawmakers said the figure aligned with existing rules for electronic money providers, and they planned further coordination with regulators. The requirement aimed to ensure stronger liquidity support and operational resilience.

A new Virtual Asset Committee would oversee crisis response across the sector. The FSC chair would lead the body, while central bank and ministry officials would support its work. This structure created a unified framework for handling systemic disruptions.

Several policy points remained unresolved, including rules for won-denominated stablecoin issuance. Lawmakers expected additional negotiations before the Digital Asset Act reached a final vote. The ongoing deliberations signaled that South Korea planned a comprehensive regulatory approach for its expanding crypto ecosystem.

The post South Korea Plans 15–20% Ownership Cap for Crypto Exchanges Under New Digital Asset Act appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Relax, Core v30 Won’t Kill Bitcoin

Relax, Core v30 Won’t Kill Bitcoin

The post Relax, Core v30 Won’t Kill Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways The rhetoric on Crypto Twitter has been heating up between Core and Knots in the OP_RETURN saga, as Bitcoin news takes on a new route. Despite some back and forth, Blockstream CEO Adam Back declared he would run Bitcoin Core v30 Despite believing the upgrade will open the network to more spam, Bitcoin OG Jimmy Song reminds people panicking that Core v30 won’t kill Bitcoin In case you missed it, the Bitcoin community is in full battle mode over Bitcoin Core v30 and the so-called OP_RETURN drama. Just mention “Core v30” in a crowded Discord and watch the fireworks. On one side, you’ve got the Bitcoin Knots faithful grabbing pitchforks and talking about the soul of the network; on the other, the Core devs, who take a more laissez-faire approach. Bitcoin News: What’s Actually Happening in Core vs Knots At the heart of the storm? Bitcoin Core’s decision to vastly expand the OP_RETURN data limit in Bitcoin Core v30. For years, Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN opcode, a line of script that lets users immutably store tiny amounts of data on the blockchain, was capped at 80 bytes. With Core v30, that ceiling is yanked off, allowing payloads up to the full block size (nearly 4MB). Proponents see big wins here: more flexibility for on-chain applications, support for digital notarization, and enhanced Layer 2 infrastructure. Critics, especially in the Knots camp, warn that this opens the door to chain bloat, endless spam, and a deviation from Bitcoin’s monetary roots. Knots developers, most notably Luke Dashjr and Samson Mow, argue that without limits, Bitcoin risks becoming a dumping ground for arbitrary data. A fate that would make running a node costly and possibly restrict network participation to large players. Since the Core update was finalized, Knots’ market share of full nodes has…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/24 14:15
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
Pi Network Tech Upgrade Unlocks Mainnet Migration for 2.5 Million Users and Introduces Palm Print Security

Pi Network Tech Upgrade Unlocks Mainnet Migration for 2.5 Million Users and Introduces Palm Print Security

Pi Network has announced a major technological breakthrough that marks a new chapter in its evolution. According to information shared by Twitter user @strong3
Share
Hokanews2026/02/07 12:28