In a sudden turn of events, non-fungible token giant Yuga Labs has lost a $9 million judgment after a U.S. appeals court ordered a trial in its lawsuit against the creators of a contested NFT collection accused of copying Bored…In a sudden turn of events, non-fungible token giant Yuga Labs has lost a $9 million judgment after a U.S. appeals court ordered a trial in its lawsuit against the creators of a contested NFT collection accused of copying Bored…

Yuga Labs’ $9m judgment overturned in Bored Ape copycat case

4 min read

In a sudden turn of events, non-fungible token giant Yuga Labs has lost a $9 million judgment after a U.S. appeals court ordered a trial in its lawsuit against the creators of a contested NFT collection accused of copying Bored Ape Yacht Club.

Summary
  • U.S. appeals court has overturned a $9 million judgment against the defendants.
  • Court said jury must decide if rival NFT collection infringed on Bored Ape Yacht Club brand.
  • A ruling affirmed that NFTs qualify as “goods” under U.S. trademark law, setting key legal precedent.

Yuga Labs was yet to prove that the rival NFT project was likely to cause consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said in a ruling issued Wednesday. The decision reverses a prior federal court order and returns the case to a lower court for trial.

Yuga Labs Vs Ripps & Cahen

Yuga Labs filed its original lawsuit in 2022, accusing Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen of launching an NFT collection called “Ryder Ripps Bored Ape Yacht Club” that allegedly mimicked its Bored Ape Yacht Club brand. 

Yuga claimed the project not only copied its name and imagery but also intended to mislead buyers and profit off its reputation.

The creators of the rival project defended their actions as a form of protest art. One of them argued that the collection was a commentary on what he described as racist imagery in Yuga’s original artwork. They denied any commercial intent to confuse or deceive buyers.

Another participant, Thomas Lehman, who was sued for his technical involvement in developing RR/BAYC project, settled separately with Yuga Labs outside of court at the time.

In 2023, a California federal court sided with Yuga Labs and awarded the company $1.6 million in damages. That figure later rose to $9 million after the defendants lost a counterclaim. 

However, Wednesday’s decision by the Ninth Circuit wiped out that award, stating the case required a full trial.

Why did the court overturn the $9 million judgment?

The appeals panel concluded that the central question—whether the contested NFT collection violated Yuga’s trademark rights—must be resolved through trial. 

The court said Yuga’s claims of trademark infringement and cybersquatting could not be resolved as a matter of law, citing unresolved questions about the likelihood of consumer confusion.

The ruling found that although the rival NFTs used similar names and imagery, Yuga Labs had not sufficiently demonstrated that the average consumer would mistake the copycat project for its own. 

The Ninth Circuit also stated that determining intent and consumer perception required factual findings that only a jury could make.

While overturning the monetary judgment, the court did uphold one of Yuga’s key legal positions: that NFTs can qualify as “goods” under U.S. trademark law. 

This is a very important ruling as this basically sets a legal precedent that may strengthen future claims brought by NFT creators against copycat projects.

However, while the court ruled that the case must proceed to trial, it rejected the defense’s argument that the copycat NFTs were protected expressive works under the First Amendment. 

The panel also dismissed claims of nominative fair use, saying the rival project’s use of Yuga’s trademarks did not meet the legal threshold for such protection.

What happens next in the case?

The case will now return to the district court in California, where a jury will consider whether the rival NFT collection infringed on Yuga Labs’ trademarks. The trial is expected to address issues such as brand confusion, artistic intent, and the commercial nature of the project.

Yuga Labs co-founder Greg Solano posted on X that the company would “finish the fight” in the lower court. 

“The Ninth Circuit confirmed: BAYC NFTs are protectable trademarks, which is an important win for every NFT holder.

We’ll now finish the fight in the district court, where the judge already fined the RR BAYC founders $9m+ in damages,” Solano wrote.

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.003826
$0.003826$0.003826
-5.71%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Today we compare Pepeto (PEPETO), BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe (and how they stack up today) by the main […] The post Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:39
Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

BitcoinWorld Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal In a dramatic shift for one of cryptocurrency’s leading networks, Solana (
Share
bitcoinworld2026/02/05 06:45