Key takeaways: Michael Burry warns Bitcoin’s selloff could accelerate into a self-reinforcing spiral as falling prices pressure corporate balance sheets […] TheKey takeaways: Michael Burry warns Bitcoin’s selloff could accelerate into a self-reinforcing spiral as falling prices pressure corporate balance sheets […] The

Bitcoin’s ETF Boom May Be Fueling the Downside, Warns Michael Burry

2026/02/04 16:07
4 min read
Key takeaways:
  • Michael Burry warns Bitcoin’s selloff could accelerate into a self-reinforcing spiral as falling prices pressure corporate balance sheets and force selling.
  • He argues Bitcoin has failed to act as a macro hedge, while ETFs and corporate adoption may be amplifying speculation rather than providing lasting support.
  • Spillover risks are emerging, with crypto-driven liquidations already hitting tokenized gold and silver, though broader financial contagion remains limited.

The investor said Bitcoin’s structure and growing role on corporate balance sheets make it vulnerable to a feedback loop of falling prices, forced selling, and broader value destruction.

Bitcoin is now roughly 40% below its October peak, and Burry believes this drawdown has exposed the asset as primarily speculative. In his view, Bitcoin has failed to behave like a hedge against currency debasement or geopolitical stress – a role often compared to gold or silver. While precious metals have rallied amid global uncertainty, Bitcoin has continued to slide.

Corporate treasuries seen as a pressure point

A key concern for Burry is the growing number of companies that have added Bitcoin to their balance sheets. He warned that even a modest additional decline could have disproportionate effects. Using Strategy Inc., the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, as an example, Burry argued that another 10% drop could push the company billions into unrealized losses and sharply limit its access to capital markets.

From there, he said, pressure would not remain isolated. As balance sheets deteriorate, companies could be forced to sell Bitcoin to manage risk, potentially spreading stress across the broader crypto market.

Burry pushed back against the idea that institutional adoption guarantees price stability. Nearly 200 public companies now hold Bitcoin, but he emphasized that treasury assets are not permanent. Because they must be marked to market, sustained losses eventually trigger intervention from risk managers, turning Bitcoin sales into an obligation rather than a discretionary choice.

ETFs amplify speculation and market correlation

Burry also criticized the impact of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. While ETFs have expanded access, he argued they have intensified speculative behavior and tied Bitcoin more closely to traditional equities. According to his analysis, Bitcoin’s correlation with the S&P 500 has recently approached 0.50, raising the risk of synchronized sell-offs during broader market stress.

He added that Bitcoin ETFs have recorded some of their largest single-day outflows since late November, with several occurring toward the end of January. As losses deepen, Burry believes liquidation dynamics could accelerate as investors reduce exposure.

READ MORE:

Bitcoin Enters a Critical Cycle Phase, Experts Warn

Price weakness and fading macro appeal

Bitcoin recently dipped below $73,000, marking its lowest level since President Donald Trump returned to the White House more than a year ago. Market participants have pointed to several factors behind the decline, including weakening liquidity, fading inflows, and a loss of macro relevance.

Unlike previous periods of turmoil, Bitcoin has not benefited from dollar weakness or geopolitical risk. At the same time, some crypto-native traders have cooled on token markets altogether, shifting attention toward prediction markets and event-based trading.

“There is no organic use-case reason for Bitcoin to slow or stop its descent,” Burry wrote, underscoring his view that price support is increasingly fragile.

Spillover risks extend beyond crypto

While Burry does not expect a Bitcoin crash to trigger a systemic financial crisis, he warned that spillover effects are already emerging. With Bitcoin’s market value below $1.5 trillion and limited household exposure, he sees broad contagion as unlikely. Past crypto failures, such as Terra and FTX, also failed to significantly impact traditional markets.

However, Burry linked Bitcoin’s decline to recent sharp moves in gold and silver. He argued that corporate treasurers and leveraged traders have been forced to liquidate profitable positions in tokenized precious metals to cover crypto losses. Because many tokenized metal futures are not backed by physical supply, heavy selling can overwhelm physical markets, creating what he described as a collateral-driven death spiral.

According to Burry, as much as $1 billion in precious metals may have been liquidated at the end of the month due to crypto-related de-risking. He warned that if Bitcoin were to fall toward $50,000, miners could face widespread bankruptcies, while tokenized metals markets could seize up due to a lack of buyers.

Burry’s core message is that Bitcoin’s biggest vulnerability may now lie off the price chart – inside balance sheets, risk models, and the growing interconnections between crypto and traditional financial markets.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Bitcoin’s ETF Boom May Be Fueling the Downside, Warns Michael Burry appeared first on Coindoo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Market Records Largest Long-Term Bitcoin Supply Release In History, Here’s What It Means For BTC

Market Records Largest Long-Term Bitcoin Supply Release In History, Here’s What It Means For BTC

Bitcoin has recorded what analysts describe as the largest long-term supply release in its history, coinciding with a sharp rise in leverage across derivatives
Share
Coinstats2026/02/08 07:06