President Donald Trump’s “cavalier approach” to the Iran war is “recklessly endangering hundreds of thousands of Americans in the Middle East.”That’s the opinionPresident Donald Trump’s “cavalier approach” to the Iran war is “recklessly endangering hundreds of thousands of Americans in the Middle East.”That’s the opinion

Trump 'recklessly endangering' Americans with 'bewildering' war game: ex-Pentagon official

2026/03/10 05:52
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

President Donald Trump’s “cavalier approach” to the Iran war is “recklessly endangering hundreds of thousands of Americans in the Middle East.”

That’s the opinion of two veteran Middle East hands revealed in a New York Times opinion piece. Jeffrey Feltman was the U.S. ambassador to Lebanon from 2004 to 2008, while Mara Karlin served as the Levant director for the Pentagon in 2006 and 2007.

They believe Trump’s inaction at the start of the Iran conflict is contradicting a key piece of his State of the Union message, wherein he opined, “the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens.”

His conduct since then has put many in danger, Feltman and Karlin contend.

The Trump administration, despite weeks of war talk, did not give sufficient warning to its embassies so that preparations for evacuation could be made, the authors claim. Such a lack of care is “bewildering."

Instead of clear-eyed instructions, there was “disarray and confusion” when the Iran attacks began, leaving U.S. diplomats and their families — not to mention American civilians — on their own.

It was not hard to foresee, the authors contend, that Iran would retaliate against the Gulf states, Israel and soft targets like airports and hotels.

Even when evacuation orders finally arrived, they were lacking in details on how or even whether the U.S. would assist in evacuations. As for allies in the region, the U.S. provided “minimal” information to help them could protect their citizens. American civilians in the Middle East did not even receive that, they claim.

At the same time, the authors argue it seems clear the United States was not expecting the scale of the Iranian response, one that has largely shut down air travel across the region and targeted sites in the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Qatar, among other countries.

The authors pointed to their own experience with a crisis in the Middle East as an example of the way things were done in a prior administration.

In 2006, they were the U.S.ambassador in Lebanon and the Pentagon’s Levant director when Lebanon’s Hezbollah organization went to war against Israel. “We responded quickly, organizing what was then the largest noncombatant evacuation of Americans in U.S. history," they explained.

Such actions “were daunting,” but things moved quickly. The State Department, Pentagon and three military commands worked on evacuations, and consular officers activated a communications network. There was also coordination with Israel on evacuation routes. All told, nearly 15,000 American citizens were moved to safety, the authors claim.

That can-do activity is in sharp contrast to now. “The U.S. Embassy in Beirut is one of several in the region that have simply closed their doors, suspending consular operations at a time they are most needed," the authors said. It was three days after the Iran war started that the Trump administration urged American citizens to evacuate, all on their own using commercial transport that was “mostly unavailable.”

“So much of this was avoidable,” the authors explained, adding that such negligence appears “willful, perhaps intentional, ignorance.” Granted, many more people needed to be evacuated from the Iran conflict than during the Lebanon crisis. “But that makes the lack of planning even more bewildering," they noted.

The authors concluded with a callback to the State of the Union, which now appears to ring hollow. “When the administration began planning this war, it should have also planned to protect Americans — the ‘first duty of the American government,’ as the president said.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Price Prediction: ARK Projects $300B Liquidity Rebound as Pepeto Targets 267x From Presale

Solana Price Prediction: ARK Projects $300B Liquidity Rebound as Pepeto Targets 267x From Presale

After months of pressure on risk assets, the tide may finally be turning. ARK Invest expects roughly $300 billion to flow back into markets as the Treasury General
Share
Techbullion2026/03/10 09:06
Nasdaq-listed crypto treasury GD Culture to add 7,500 BTC after Pallas Capital acquisition closes

Nasdaq-listed crypto treasury GD Culture to add 7,500 BTC after Pallas Capital acquisition closes

Those tokens are worth around $876 million at current prices, making GDC among the top 15 largest publicly traded bitcoin holders.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:19