Bybit scores 3.8 out of 5 on our six-dimension scorecard as of September 2026, leading on derivatives with a Unified Trading Account, an options market and deep books on majors, and held at 3.5 onBybit scores 3.8 out of 5 on our six-dimension scorecard as of September 2026, leading on derivatives with a Unified Trading Account, an options market and deep books on majors, and held at 3.5 on
เรียนรู้/Comparisons & Reviews/Platform & Product Reviews/Bybit Review 2026: 3.8 Out of 5, the Deepest Perpetuals Book Outside the US, and a $1.46 Billion Theft Covered in 72 Hours
Bybit Review 2026: 3.8 Out of 5, the Deepest Perpetuals Book Outside the US, and a $1.46 Billion Theft Covered in 72 Hours
Bybit scores 3.8 out of 5 on our six-dimension scorecard as of September 2026, leading on derivatives with a Unified Trading Account, an options market and deep books on majors, and held at 3.5 on security by a February 2025 theft of roughly $1.46 billion that was covered within 72 hours with no user losses; it suits perpetuals and options traders outside the United States, Canada and Japan, and it is the wrong pick for makers who want 0% from the first trade, for UK retail traders who need derivatives, and for anyone who weighs a recent incident above product depth.
Key Takeaways
- Bybit scores 3.8 out of 5 overall, with a 5.0 on derivatives and a 3.5 on fees, asset coverage, security and custody and deposits and withdrawals.
- Spot fees are 0.1000% maker and 0.1000% taker at VIP 0, or 0.0750% paid in MNT, and perpetuals are 0.0200% maker and 0.0550% taker on USDT, USDC and inverse contracts, with one schedule for web and API orders.
- On $500,000 of monthly BTC perpetual taker volume Bybit costs $3,300 a year against $1,200 at MEXC's 0.020% Special Rate, and on the same volume of resting spot orders it costs $6,000 against $0; a bot through an API pays $3,300 on Bybit and $4,800 on MEXC.
- On 21 February 2025 an attacker gained control of a Bybit cold wallet during a routine transfer, reported losses were roughly $1.4 to $1.5 billion, reserves were reassembled within 72 hours, withdrawals stayed open and no user losses were reported.
- Bybit EU holds a MiCA authorisation from Austria's FMA with spot and margin but no perpetuals, the UK relaunch of December 2025 covers spot and P2P only, and Bybit exited Japan and Malaysia.
- Third-party trackers attribute roughly 740 perpetual contracts to Bybit against more than 1,040 on MEXC's fee page, and Bybit's curated listing policy is a strength on majors and a constraint on the long tail.
Why Do Perpetuals Traders Still Compare Bybit After February 2025?
Bybit is the derivatives-first exchange most active traders outside the United States already know, and the people comparing it in 2026 are doing one of three things: spreading counterparty risk after the February 2025 theft, reacting to a change in what Bybit can legally offer in their region, or looking for contracts and pricing that a curated venue does not provide.
The first is a custody question with a documented answer, which the security section sets out as a neutral timeline.
The second has changed twice in a year: the UK relaunch of December 2025 restored spot and P2P but not derivatives, and the Japan wind-down closed accounts in stages through July 2026.
The third has a measurable answer, because a perpetual taker fee is charged on leveraged notional on every entry and every exit, and a fee that looks trivial per trade is paid hundreds of times a year.
The rest of this review scores the platform dimension by dimension and dates every number.
How We Scored Bybit
This review scores Bybit from 0 to 5 on six equally weighted dimensions: fees and costs, asset coverage, derivatives, security and custody, deposits and withdrawals, and customer support.
Every figure comes from Bybit's own fee structure, help centre, proof-of-reserves pages or terms, from a regulator, from CoinGecko or another third-party tracker, or from an established news organisation, and each carries a retrieval date.
Regional availability and regulatory standing are disclosed but never scored, because a platform is either usable where you live or it is not.
MEXC operates a competing exchange, and the full scoring rules, source hierarchy and conflict-of-interest policy are published in our exchange review methodology.
The support score is based on published channels only; our timed-ticket test for this platform is scheduled for the next review cycle.
Bybit Scorecard 2026: Six Scores and One Overall Figure
Bybit earns 3.8 out of 5 overall, with a 5.0 on derivatives, 4.0 on customer support, and 3.5 on fees and costs, asset coverage, security and custody and deposits and withdrawals, a profile built for hedged and options-led derivatives traders rather than for makers or new-listing hunters.
Readers weighing more than one platform can start with our guide to the best crypto exchanges in 2026.
Dimension | Score (out of 5) | What we measured | Verified against |
Fees and costs | 3.5 | 0.1000% maker and 0.1000% taker on spot at VIP 0, 0.0750% paid in MNT, 0.0200% maker and 0.0550% taker on perpetuals with a 10% MNT discount that excludes API trades, 0.0200% and 0.0300% on options, 0.2000% on Adventure Zone and xStocks pairs, VIP 1 at about $250,000 in assets or $10 million of 30-day futures volume | Published fee structure and help centre |
Asset coverage | 3.5 | Roughly 740 perpetual contracts attributed by third-party trackers, a curated spot list with an Adventure Zone for newer tokens, seven days of delisting notice and a withdrawal window of about three months in our listing disclosure index | Third-party trackers, our listing disclosure index |
Derivatives | 5 | Unified Trading Account pooling collateral across spot, margin, perpetuals and options, USDC-settled options at 0.0200% maker and 0.0300% taker, pre-market perpetuals, copy trading with per-master parameters, deep books on major contracts | Fee structure and product documentation |
Security and custody | 3.5 | February 2025 cold-wallet theft of roughly $1.4 to $1.5 billion, reserves reassembled within 72 hours, withdrawals open throughout, no user losses reported, Merkle-tree proof of reserves with third-party wallet verification audited monthly by Hacken since June 2024, an insurance fund for derivatives | Mainstream reporting, Hacken, proof-of-reserves pages |
Deposits and withdrawals | 3.5 | Crypto rails with standard KYC, spot and P2P rails in the UK since December 2025, limits set per verification level, fiat routes that vary by entity and were not measured on an open page in this review | Help centre and terms |
Customer support | 4 | Help centre and live chat channels; timed ticket test not yet run | Platform support pages |
Overall | 3.8 | Average of the six dimensions | Methodology page |
What Does Bybit Charge in Fees?
Fees and costs: 3.5 out of 5.
Bybit charges 0.1000% maker and 0.1000% taker on spot at VIP 0, falling to 0.0675% and 0.0800% at VIP 1 and to 0.0750% when fees are paid in MNT, 0.0200% maker and 0.0550% taker on every USDT, USDC and inverse perpetual with a 10% MNT discount that excludes API trades, and 0.0200% maker and 0.0300% taker on options, with the same derivatives schedule applying to web and API orders.
VIP 1 requires roughly $250,000 in assets or $10 million of 30-day futures volume, so most accounts stay on the standard rate for as long as they trade.
Newer tokens in the Adventure Zone and xStocks tokenized equities carry their own schedule of 0.2000% on both sides at VIP 0, double the main spot rate.
Our methodology prices the same monthly volume on every platform, so the table below runs three spot volumes for a full year and adds the perpetual and API lines where the order of the comparison changes.
Scenario | Bybit at VIP 0 | MEXC at the standard tier |
$1,000 of monthly spot taker volume | $12 a year at 0.1000%; $9 paid in MNT | $6 a year at 0.05%; $4.80 with the MX deduction |
$50,000 of monthly spot taker volume | $600 a year; $450 paid in MNT | $300 a year; $240 with the MX deduction |
$500,000 of monthly spot maker volume | $6,000 a year at 0.1000% | $0 at the published maker rate |
$500,000 of monthly BTC perpetual taker volume, web or app | $3,300 a year at 0.0550%; $2,970 paid in MNT | $1,200 a year at the 0.020% BTCUSDT Special Rate; $960 with the MX deduction |
$500,000 of monthly perpetual taker volume through an API | $3,300 a year at 0.0550% | $4,800 a year at 0.080% on MEXC's API futures schedule |
Calculated from each platform's published standard tier, verified as of 2 September 2026; Bybit's MNT discount is 25% on spot and 10% on futures and excludes API trades; MEXC's Special Rate applies to selected contracts and its API futures schedule overrides its discounts; spreads, funding and network fees are excluded.
Funding settles every eight hours on both platforms and no exchange discounts it, so fee choice decides the cost if you scalp and funding decides it if you hold.
The score is 3.5 rather than 3.0 because the perpetual schedule sits in the competitive band, the options rate is low and the API schedule is the same as the web, and rather than 4.0 because 0.1000% on both sides of spot is the market norm rather than below it and the 0.2000% Adventure Zone rate is the highest spot tier among the offshore venues in this series.
How Broad Is Bybit's Asset Coverage?
Asset coverage: 3.5 out of 5.
Third-party trackers attribute roughly 740 perpetual contracts to Bybit, its spot list is curated with an Adventure Zone for newer tokens at a higher fee, and our listing disclosure index records seven days of delisting notice and a withdrawal window of about three months, so the catalogue is deep on majors, thinner on the long tail, and orderly on the way out.
We do not score platforms on self-reported coin totals, and the tracked contract count is the figure we cite.
Bybit is not slow when it decides to move: it ran TRUMP pre-market perpetuals from 18 January 2025, and its pre-market product gives early exposure to selected launches.
The difference is what happens on the hundreds of launches that never get a same-day decision at a curated venue, and that is the reader for whom a 740-contract list is a limitation rather than a filter.
Faster listing elsewhere means less vetting, and plenty of tokens that list within days of launch bleed out after the opening move, so Bybit's slower process is a filter as much as a delay.
How Strong Is Bybit for Derivatives?
Derivatives: 5.0 out of 5.
Bybit runs a Unified Trading Account that pools collateral across spot, margin, perpetuals and options, prices perpetuals at 0.0200% maker and 0.0550% taker, runs a USDC-settled options market at 0.0200% maker and 0.0300% taker that very few centralised exchanges match, lists pre-market perpetuals ahead of selected launches, and documents copy trading with per-master parameters and multi-master following, which is the most complete derivatives stack in this series alongside OKX.
Depth is the other half of the case: Bybit's books on major contracts hold up under size in a way the long-tail venues' books do not.
The options market is a fork in the road rather than a comparison, because most offshore competitors, MEXC included, do not offer one.
A leverage number without its position band is marketing rather than a specification, so we do not quote a single maximum figure for Bybit, and the risk-limit tiers on any contract are the thing to read before sizing a position.
The one place Bybit gives ground is contract count, roughly 740 against more than 1,040 on MEXC's fee page, which matters to a trader whose edge is in small-cap perpetuals and not to one running spreads on majors.
Is Bybit Safe After the 2025 Hack? Security, Custody and the 72-Hour Record
Security and custody: 3.5 out of 5.
On 21 February 2025 an attacker gained control of a Bybit Ethereum cold wallet during a routine transfer to a warm wallet, reported losses were roughly $1.4 to $1.5 billion in ether and related tokens, the largest recorded exchange theft at the time, and within 72 hours Bybit had reassembled its reserves through emergency loans and deposits, kept withdrawals open throughout and reported no user losses, which is the strongest crisis record in this series and still an incident inside the last two years.
The sequence, neutrally stated: Bybit confirmed the theft on 21 February 2025, CNBC reported that reserves were replenished within 72 hours, and Hacken's ad hoc proof-of-reserves audit on 23 February 2025 found a reserve ratio above 100%.
Bybit publishes Merkle-tree proof of reserves with third-party verification of wallet ownership, audited monthly by Hacken since June 2024, and runs an insurance fund covering derivatives liquidations.
Our rule for this dimension is consistent across the series: an incident inside the last two years, fully covered, on a platform with monthly attested reserves, scores 3.5, and the score rises to 4.0 once the incident passes the two-year mark with no repeat, which for Bybit is February 2027.
The compromised signing process on a cold wallet is the custody warning that the recovery does not erase, and a reader who holds idle balances on any exchange should read it that way.
Two-factor authentication, withdrawal whitelisting, anti-phishing codes and device management are all available and should all be switched on before an account holds a balance.
For how Bybit's reserve method compares with every other major exchange, our proof-of-reserves comparison sets the methods side by side, and our crypto exchange hacks database lists 81 breaches with their reimbursement outcomes.
How Easy Are Deposits and Withdrawals on Bybit?
Deposits and withdrawals: 3.5 out of 5.
Bybit runs standard KYC before funding, crypto rails across the networks a global exchange is expected to cover, a spot and P2P venue in the UK since December 2025 under a financial promotions arrangement approved by Archax, and fiat routes that vary by entity in ways we could not measure on an open page in this review, which is why the score sits at 3.5 rather than at the level its rails may deserve.
Our methodology scores what can be read on a published page, and where a platform's fiat menu differs by entity or is shown only after sign-in, the score reflects the disclosure rather than the rail.
Withdrawal limits are set per verification level and shown inside the account, and a small test withdrawal before moving size is the rule on every platform in this series.
The next review cycle will measure Bybit's fiat routes directly, and the score will move if they can be read on an open page.
What Is Bybit Customer Support Like?
Customer support: 4.0 out of 5.
Bybit publishes a help centre and a live chat channel, and we have capped the score at 4.0 until our own timed ticket test runs, because a published channel is a promise and a timed reply is a measurement.
Our rule is one non-urgent ticket per platform per review cycle, timed from submission to a reply that answers the question, and Bybit's test is scheduled for the next cycle.
Third-party review sites describe template replies and slow responses during withdrawal reviews, and our methodology does not count aggregate star ratings, so those reports are noted here rather than scored.
Where Is Bybit Available, and What Changed in the UK, the EU and Japan?
Bybit does not serve the United States or Canada, offers spot and P2P only in the United Kingdom since December 2025, offers spot and margin but no perpetuals in the EEA through Bybit EU under a MiCA authorisation, has exited Japan and Malaysia, and MEXC does not onboard residents of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, the EEA, Singapore or Hong Kong, so readers in those markets should use a locally licensed venue for perpetuals.
Bybit
The UK relaunch of December 2025, as reported by CoinDesk, covers roughly 100 spot pairs and a peer-to-peer venue, and crypto derivatives remain restricted for UK retail consumers, so a UK trader who used Bybit for perpetuals has not had that product restored.
Bybit EU GmbH holds a crypto-asset service provider authorisation from Austria's Financial Market Authority, and MiCA governs crypto-asset services rather than derivatives, which is why the EU entity lists spot and margin and not perpetual contracts.
Bybit announced in December 2025 that it would wind down services for Japanese residents in phases, moved to close-only from 23 March 2026, and began forced closure of remaining positions from 22 July 2026.
The Securities Commission Malaysia ordered Bybit in December 2024 to disable its website and apps, and Bybit complied.
Singapore and Hong Kong are excluded, Kazakhstan is available, and standard KYC applies in most other markets.
MEXC
MEXC does not serve residents of the United States or the United Kingdom, and readers there should use a platform licensed by their local regulator.
As of 17 September 2026, MEXC is not authorised under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation and appears on ESMA's register of non-compliant entities following a September 2025 decision by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets; readers in the EU and EEA should treat a MiCA-authorised platform as the appropriate option.
MEXC appears on Japan's FSA list of unregistered operators and its apps are not distributed through Japanese app stores, so nothing on this page is a recommendation for Japan residents leaving Bybit to open a MEXC account instead.
MEXC's user agreement also prohibits Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Kazakhstan and mainland China, and the full list is in our restricted countries guide.
Bybit Benefits and Limitations
Benefits
- A Unified Trading Account and a USDC-settled options market at 0.0200% maker and 0.0300% taker, which very few centralised exchanges run.
- One derivatives schedule for web and API orders, which makes Bybit the cheaper venue for bots by a wide margin.
- A February 2025 record of reassembling reserves within 72 hours with withdrawals open and no user losses, and monthly Hacken-audited proof of reserves since June 2024.
- A MiCA-authorised EU entity, a UK spot and P2P venue, and copy trading with per-master parameters.
Limitations
- A spot rate of 0.1000% on both sides at VIP 0, a 0.2000% rate on Adventure Zone and xStocks pairs, and a VIP 1 threshold most accounts never reach.
- A cold-wallet signing process that was compromised in February 2025, an incident still inside the two-year window our rules use.
- Roughly 740 perpetual contracts against more than 1,040 at the broadest competitor, and no perpetuals for UK retail or EEA customers.
- Exits from Japan and Malaysia, and fiat routes that vary by entity and could not be measured on an open page in this review.
Who Bybit Is For, and Who Should Look Elsewhere
Bybit is the right pick for traders outside the United States, Canada and Japan who run hedged books, trade options, or route strategies through an API, and it is the wrong pick for makers who want 0% from the first trade, for UK retail traders who need derivatives, and for anyone who weighs a recent custody incident above product depth.
Bybit is the right pick if:
- Your positions are meant to offset one another and the Unified Trading Account saves you real capital.
- You trade options or multi-leg structures, which most offshore venues do not offer.
- You run bots through an API and want one schedule for every route.
Look elsewhere if:
- You place resting orders on many pairs and a 0.1000% maker fee is a number you notice.
- You want small-cap contracts that a curated list of roughly 740 does not reach.
- You live in the United States, Canada or Japan, or you are a UK retail trader who needs perpetuals, where Bybit cannot serve you.
Running Bybit alongside a zero-maker venue is the common answer: execution cost from whichever venue prices your contracts best, and custody assurance from not leaving idle balances anywhere.
Our Bybit alternatives comparison covers the derivatives venues that compete on that execution cost.
For the wider field, our exchange alternatives hub carries a nine-platform availability matrix, and our listing-speed comparison sets out the timestamp method behind the breadth figures above.
The MEXC View
MEXC operates a competing exchange, and this section is where our own position is stated rather than implied.
Bybit beats MEXC on options, on the Unified Trading Account, on the API fee line, on regulatory footprint in the EU and the UK, and on a documented crisis record that is the strongest trust datapoint in this series, and a hedged, options-led or automated trader has a defensible reason to make Bybit the main account.
Our full MEXC vs Bybit comparison sets out where each platform leads.
Where MEXC is the answer, for readers outside its restricted markets, is the manual perpetual line and the maker side.
A manual BTC perpetual taker moving $500,000 a month pays $3,300 a year at Bybit's 0.0550% and $1,200 at MEXC's 0.020% BTCUSDT Special Rate, or $960 with the MX deduction, an ETH perpetual taker pays $3,300 against $600 at 0.010%, and a spot maker at the same volume pays $6,000 at Bybit's 0.1000% and $0 at MEXC's published maker rate.
A trader running twenty round trips a month on $12,500 positions pays that BTC fee 480 times a year, which is why a gap that looks trivial per trade becomes $2,100 a year.
MEXC's fee page carries more than 1,040 USDT-margined contracts against roughly 740 attributed to Bybit, and CoinGecko's 2026 perpetuals report counted 879 new perpetual contracts on MEXC between January 2025 and April 2026, the most of any major centralised exchange.
Two boundaries keep the fee claim honest.
The zero applies to spot maker orders and to web and app futures orders, not to API-routed futures, which MEXC prices at 0.060% maker and 0.080% taker, so a bot pays $4,800 a year on MEXC and $3,300 on Bybit on the same $500,000 of monthly volume, and the 0.020% figure is a Special Rate on BTCUSDT rather than MEXC's standard 0.040% taker.
And the saving is available only to readers outside the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, the EEA, Singapore and Hong Kong, and it is not an invitation to Japan residents leaving Bybit, because MEXC appears on the same FSA list.
MEXC has no options market and no unified margin account, its reserve documentation is thinner than Bybit's post-incident audit record, and its most common complaint in third-party reviews is risk-control reviews that delay withdrawals, so a test withdrawal comes before moving size.
Our review desk's verdict is that execution cost and custody assurance are two separate purchases, and many traders sensibly buy the first from MEXC and the second from Bybit while leaving idle balances on neither.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bybit safe after the 2025 hack?
Bybit reassembled its reserves within 72 hours of the 21 February 2025 theft, kept withdrawals open and reported no user losses, and publishes monthly Hacken-audited proof of reserves.
It scores 3.5 out of 5 on security and custody because the incident is still inside the two-year window our rules use.
Was Bybit hacked?
Yes, on 21 February 2025 an attacker gained control of a cold wallet during a routine transfer, with reported losses of roughly $1.4 to $1.5 billion attributed to the Lazarus Group.
Reserves were replenished within 72 hours and no user losses were reported.
Is Bybit legit and regulated?
Bybit EU holds a MiCA authorisation from Austria's FMA, the UK entity runs spot and P2P under an approved financial promotions arrangement, and Bybit does not serve the United States or Canada.
Regulatory standing is disclosed in this review and not scored.
What are Bybit's fees?
Spot is 0.1000% maker and 0.1000% taker at VIP 0, or 0.0750% paid in MNT, and perpetuals are 0.0200% maker and 0.0550% taker with the same schedule for API orders.
Options are 0.0200% maker and 0.0300% taker, and Adventure Zone and xStocks pairs are 0.2000% on both sides.
Can I use Bybit in the US, the UK or Japan?
No in the United States, spot and P2P only in the United Kingdom since December 2025, and no in Japan, where accounts went close-only on 23 March 2026 and remaining positions were force-closed from 22 July 2026.
EEA customers get spot and margin through Bybit EU without perpetuals.
Does Bybit require KYC?
Yes, standard identity verification applies before funding, and withdrawal limits are set per verification level and shown inside the account.
Misrepresenting residency is grounds for account closure and liquidation of open positions.
How does Bybit compare with MEXC?
Bybit leads on options, the Unified Trading Account, the API fee line and its crisis record, while MEXC publishes 0% maker on spot and 0.020% taker on BTCUSDT and lists more than 1,040 perpetual contracts against roughly 740.
Readers outside the US, UK, Canada, EEA, Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan can compare the full fee stack across platforms in our exchange fee comparison.
Risk and Compliance Notice
Trading cryptocurrencies involves substantial risk, and perpetual futures, options and leveraged products can produce losses greater than the amount deposited.
Funding payments accrue every eight hours regardless of whether a position is profitable.
Nothing on this page is financial, investment, legal or tax advice.
MEXC operates a competing exchange; no platform can buy a score or a ranking position on MEXC Learn.
MEXC is not available in every jurisdiction and is not authorised under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation; readers in the European Union, the European Economic Area, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Singapore and Hong Kong should use a platform authorised by their local regulator, and readers in Japan should use a platform registered with the Financial Services Agency.
Always confirm current terms on a platform's own official pages before opening an account or placing a trade.
Read More
- Bybit KYC Requirements (2026): Which Level Do You Actually Need, and Is 20K USDT Without It Still Real?
- How to Transfer Crypto From Bybit to Another Exchange: Why Is Your Transferable Amount Smaller Than Your Balance?
- Bybit vs Bitget (2026): 0.055% or 0.06% on Perpetuals, and Which One Is Still Open Where You Live?
- OKX vs Bybit (2026): 0.05% or 0.055% on Perpetuals, 0.08% or 0.10% on Spot, and Which One Is Licensed Where You Live?
- Bybit vs KuCoin (2026): 0.055% or 0.06% on Perpetuals, 447 or 889 Coins, and Which One Serves Your Country?
- Top 10 Crypto Exchanges by Trading Volume 2026: $18.7 Trillion Traded, and Four Rankings That Disagree
- Crypto Exchange Fee Comparison: Only 6 of 12 Exchanges Will Show You Their Fees Without an Account
โอกาสทางการตลาด
ราคา Bitcoin(BTC)
$80,949.95
$80,949.95$80,949.95
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) กราฟราคาสด
บทความนี้ที่เขียนโดย ซาร่าห์ เฉิน มีไว้เพื่อวัตถุประสงค์ในการให้ข้อมูลเท่านั้น และไม่ถือเป็นคำแนะนำทางการเงินหรือการลงทุนแต่อย่างใด ตลาดสกุลเงินดิจิทัลมีความเสี่ยงอย่างมาก โปรดดำเนินการวิจัยอิสระหรือปรึกษาผู้เชี่ยวชาญที่มีคุณสมบัติก่อนตัดสินใจลงทุนใดๆ มุมมองที่แสดงไม่ได้แสดงถึงมุมมองของบริษัท MEXC หรือบริษัทในเครือ
บทความยอดนิยม
ดูเพิ่มเติม
MEXC Alpha Trader รายงานการวิจัยรายสัปดาห์ | อัตราเงินเฟ้อสูงเกินคาดในทุกด้าน ขณะที่กองทุน ETF มียอดไถ่ถอนสุทธิ 228 ล้านดอลลาร์ต่อสัปดาห์ — กระแสการปรับลดอัตราดอกเบี้ยกำลังเผชิญกับ "บททดสอบความเครียด" หรือไม่?
สัปดาห์ที่ 3 ของเดือนตุลาคม 2026 ช่วงเวลาสถิติ: 14 ตุลาคม – 20 ตุลาคม 2026 วันที่ตัดข้อมูล: 20 ตุลาคม 2026 แก่นเรื่องหลัก ในช่วงสัปดาห์ที่ผ่านมา ตลาดคริปโตยังคงอ่อนแอและเคลื่อนไหวในกรอบแคบ โดยถูกกดดัน
"Uptober" ชนกำแพง: กระแส ETF พลิกกลับ ขณะที่ 17,733 BTC ท่วมตลาด — ซื้อช่วงราคาตกหรือหนีออกไป? | MEXC Alpha Trader รายงานวิจัยรายสัปดาห์
สัปดาห์ที่ 2 ของเดือนตุลาคม 2026 ช่วงเวลาสถิติ: 7 – 13 ตุลาคม 2026 วันที่ตัดข้อมูล: 13 ตุลาคม 2026 แก่นเรื่องหลัก ในช่วงสัปดาห์ที่ผ่านมา ตลาดคริปโตผ่านวงจรเต็มรูปแบบของการปรับตัวขึ้นที่ขับเคลื่อนด้วยโ
ขึ้นอัตราดอกเบี้ยแล้ว BTC ทะลุจุดสูงสุดในรอบ 8 เดือน — ข่าวร้ายถูกคิดราคาไปแล้วหรือเป็นการรีบาวด์แบบ Short-Squeeze? | MEXC Alpha Trader วิจัยรายสัปดาห์
สัปดาห์ที่ 3 ของเดือนกันยายน 2026 ช่วงเวลาสถิติ: 16 กันยายน – 22 กันยายน 2026 จุดตัดข้อมูล: 22 กันยายน 2026 แก่นเรื่องหลัก ในช่วงสัปดาห์ที่ผ่านมา ตลาดคริปโตเคลื่อนตัวผ่านวงจรเต็มรูปแบบของแรงกดดันก่อนก
CPI พุ่งขึ้น กระตุ้นความกังวลเรื่องการขึ้นดอกเบี้ย; อัตราผลตอบแทนพันธบัตรรัฐบาลสหรัฐฯ ทะลุ 5% สู่ระดับสูงสุดในรอบ 19 ปี: ตลาดกำลังตั้งราคาอะไรไว้? | MEXC Alpha Trader Research รายสัปดาห์
กันยายน 2026, สัปดาห์ที่ 2 รอบระยะเวลารายงาน: 9 กันยายน – 15 กันยายน 2026 จุดตัดข้อมูล: 15 กันยายน 2026 ภาพรวมตลาด สัปดาห์ที่ผ่านมา ตลาดคริปโตเผชิญแรงกดดันอย่างต่อเนื่องจากปัจจัยลบหลายประการที่รวมกัน
ข่าวที่กำลังมาแรง
ดูเพิ่มเติม
รายงาน On-chain ประจำวันของ MEXC: US spot Bitcoin ETFs มีเงินไหลออก 1.29 พันล้านดอลลาร์ใน 7 วัน
ตลาดคริปโตยังคงเผชิญแรงกดดัน เนื่องจากกระแสเงินไหลออกจาก Bitcoin ETF เร่งตัวขึ้น และตลาดเริ่มรับรู้ความเป็นไปได้ที่ Fed อาจปรับขึ้นอัตราดอกเบี้ยอีกครั้งในช่วงปลายปีนี้มากขึ้น ในขณะเดียวกัน โครงสร้างพื
รายงานออนเชนประจำวันของ MEXC: ธนาคารกลางรัสเซียจำกัดนักลงทุนรายย่อยให้ซื้อขายได้เฉพาะ BTC, ETH และ USDT
การมีส่วนร่วมของสถาบันกำลังกลายเป็นแรงขับเคลื่อนการเติบโตหลักในตลาดคริปโต ตั้งแต่เครือข่ายการชำระเงินด้วย Stablecoin และหลักทรัพย์ที่ถูก Tokenize ไปจนถึงบริการสาธารณะที่ขับเคลื่อนด้วยบล็อกเชนและโครงสร
รายงานออนเชนประจำวันของ MEXC: Bitcoin ETF แบบ Spot ในสหรัฐฯ มียอดไหลออกสุทธิ 319 ล้านดอลลาร์เมื่อสัปดาห์ที่แล้ว
ตลาดคริปโตเผชิญกับเงินไหลออกจาก ETF การเปลี่ยนแปลงด้านกฎระเบียบ และแนวโน้มการ Tokenization ที่เพิ่มขึ้น ไฮไลต์สำคัญ ได้แก่ ความ낙วางใจในการ IPO ของ SpaceX แผนนโยบาย Tokenization ของ SEC การขยายตัวด้านอ
คำเตือน Coldcard Mk3 ตามมาหลังจากการกวาด Bitcoin มูลค่า 38 ล้านดอลลาร์ แต่สาเหตุยังไม่ได้รับการยืนยัน
ผู้ผลิตฮาร์ดแวร์วอลเลต Bitcoin อย่าง Coinkite ได้ออกคำเตือนผู้ใช้เกี่ยวกับปัญหาการสร้าง seed ที่ส่งผลต่ออุปกรณ์ Coldcard รวมถึงเฟิร์มแวร์ Mk3 ทุกเวอร์ชันตั้งแต่ 4.0.1 เป็นต้นไป คำเตือนดังกล่าวเกิดขึ้น
บทความที่เกี่ยวข้อง
ดูเพิ่มเติม
Bitget Review 2026: 3.8 Out of 5, the Deepest Copy-Trading Shelf, and a Japan Exit With Three Dates You Need
Bitget scores 3.8 out of 5 on our six-dimension scorecard as of 25 September 2026, leading on derivatives, holding a provisional 3.5 on security after the hot-wallet incident of about $351.6 million i
How Deep Is MEXC's Liquidity? Order Book Depth, Slippage, and What Third-Party Reports Show
Liquidity is the difference between the price you clicked and the price you got.This page tracks MEXC liquidity the way third-party researchers measure it: order book depth in tight bands around the m
Kraken Crypto Exchange Review 2026: 3.7 Out of 5, a 0.80% Entry Taker Fee, Four Licences, and the First Mark on a Clean Custody Record
Kraken, the crypto exchange rather than the headset, water-cooler or rum brands that share the name, scores 3.7 out of 5 on our six-dimension scorecard as of September 2026, leading on deposits and wi
KuCoin Review 2026: 3.8 Out of 5, Three Dates the Web Gets Wrong, and a MiCA Licence It Cannot Use Yet
KuCoin scores 3.8 out of 5 on our six-dimension scorecard as of September 2026, competitive on asset coverage, derivatives and security with a 2020 theft that every user was made whole from, and behin
