Every exchange with a marketing budget says its liquidity ranks first. The only ranking that pays you back is the price your own order fills at. This guide shows how to judge that yourself, usingEvery exchange with a marketing budget says its liquidity ranks first. The only ranking that pays you back is the price your own order fills at. This guide shows how to judge that yourself, using
Learn/Comparisons & Reviews/Platform & Product Reviews/Top 1 for Whom? How to Judge Crypto Exchange Liquidity, With MEXC's Depth and Slippage Data
Top 1 for Whom? How to Judge Crypto Exchange Liquidity, With MEXC's Depth and Slippage Data
Every exchange with a marketing budget says its liquidity ranks first.
The only ranking that pays you back is the price your own order fills at.
This guide shows how to judge that yourself, using MEXC's October 28, 2026 order-book comparison and every 2026 third-party report, including where MEXC did not win.
Key Takeaways
- Exchange liquidity only means something for a given market, price band and order size, and no venue was first on every combination in the 2026 reports here.
- In MEXC's own comparison against four other major centralized exchanges, averaged over three days to October 28, 2026, MEXC had more depth within 0.01% of the mid price on 10 of 10 core assets and 18 of 20 stock futures.
- In the same comparison, MEXC's simulated slippage was lowest on 19 of 20 stock futures at $10,000 and 10 of 10 core assets at $1,000,000, but not on BTC at $500,000.
- TokenInsight's July and September 2026 reports placed MEXC first for BTC and ETH futures depth within 0.03%, with second and third places at wider bands and in spot.
- CoinGecko's 2026 spot study put MEXC first for SOL and DOGE depth at the market price and last of eight for ETH depth within $3 of the price.
- Depth decides your fill, so check near-price depth, slippage at your size and fees before volume or a liquidity score.
Which crypto exchange has the best liquidity?
The crypto exchange with the best liquidity depends on the market, price band and order size you measure, because no exchange ranked first on every combination in the 2026 TokenInsight reports, CoinGecko's 2026 spot study or MEXC's October 28, 2026 comparison.
MEXC led most of the narrowest bands in TokenInsight's July, August and September 2026 samples and placed second or third at wider bands.
In CoinGecko's 2026 spot study (eight exchanges, July 6 to September 3, 2026), MEXC had the deepest SOL and DOGE books at the market price but the thinnest ETH book within $3.
How do you judge liquidity for your own trade?
Judging liquidity for your own trade means measuring the order book at the price and size you plan to use, not reading a volume table, because volume counts trades already done while liquidity is the resting size that fills the next one.
The four checks, in order: near-price depth, slippage at your size, fees, and round-trip cost as a share of margin.
Trader | What they watch | Core question | Measures to use |
Retail traders | Bid-ask spread, near-price depth, slippage, fees | At what price will my order fill? | Depth at your size, simulated slippage, execution cost |
Institutional traders | Market impact, wider-band depth, fill efficiency | How do I fill a large trade with limited market impact? | Multi-band depth, large-order cost, staggered execution |
Typical priorities, not fixed categories: institutions also watch near-price depth, and active retail traders also trade big.
The five measures TokenInsight uses
TokenInsight's August 2026 equity perpetuals report scores venues on product coverage, position limits by leverage tier, depth in bands around the mid price, median slippage on simulated sells, and P90 slippage, the level nine of ten fills landed at or below.
Its crypto exchange reports use depth, slippage and the bid-ask spread.
What does MEXC's latest order-book comparison show?
MEXC's latest order-book comparison shows more depth within 0.01% of the mid price than the best of four other major centralized exchanges on 10 of 10 core assets and 18 of 20 popular stock futures, and the lowest simulated slippage on most assets at most sizes, though not all.
In MEXC's own comparison of order-book snapshots against four other major centralized exchanges, averaged over three days to October 28, 2026, simulated slippage is the average of a buy and a sell against the snapshot mid-price, excluding fees and funding; each MEXC figure is set against the best of the four on that asset and size, and every figure is one side, so a round trip is twice it.
Two overlapping samples were measured, never added together: ten core assets (BTC, ETH, SOL, gold, silver, Brent, WTI, SK hynix, Micron and SpaceX perpetuals) and twenty stock futures such as AAPL, MSFT, TSLA, AMD, SPY, SPCX, NVDA and QQQ.
Within 0.01% of the mid price, MEXC's book was deeper on 10 of 10 core assets and 18 of 20 stock futures, with median multiples of 5.62x and 4.65x.
BTC held $16.59 million against $4.00 million (4.15x), silver $4.79 million against $0.44 million (10.89x), and SPY $6.94 million against $0.42 million (16.58x).
The guide to how near-price depth is measured explains why equal total depth can fill orders differently.
Order size | Core assets where MEXC's simulated slippage was lowest (of 10) | Stock futures where MEXC's simulated slippage was lowest (of 20) |
10,000 USDT | 6 of 10 | 19 of 20 |
100,000 USDT | 9 of 10 | 19 of 20 |
500,000 USDT | 9 of 10 | 20 of 20 |
1,000,000 USDT | 10 of 10 | 18 of 20 |
BTC at $500,000 is the exception: MEXC's simulated one-way slippage cost was $6.79 against $6.54 for the best other book, about $0.24 more.
A deeper near-price book does not mean the lowest slippage at every size, so the second check is slippage at your own order size, and one snapshot cannot promise the same result on every future trade.
How does MEXC rank in third-party liquidity reports?
MEXC ranked first in at least one headline measure in each of TokenInsight's four 2026 liquidity reports and in CoinGecko's 2026 spot study, but also second, third and, in one CoinGecko band, last, so the table lists every published rank, not just the wins.
Report (sample, window) | Market and measure | MEXC result | Rank in sample |
TokenInsight, May 2026 (8 exchanges) | Silver (XAG) futures slippage, $500K and $1M sells; bid-ask spread | 0.019%, 0.035%; 1.196 bps | Lowest; tightest |
May 2026 | ETH futures slippage, $1M and $5M sells | 0.015%, 0.050% | 1st |
May 2026 | Precious metals futures depth, 0.1% and 0.3% | $4.3M, $8.9M | 3rd |
TokenInsight, July 2026 (9 exchanges) | BTC and ETH futures depth, 0.03%; 0.05% | $15.71M; $20.83M | 1st; 3rd |
July 2026 | ETH futures slippage, $500K and $1M sells | 0.006%, 0.015% | Lowest |
July 2026 | BTC futures slippage, $500K and $1M sells | 0.003%, 0.009% | 2nd |
July 2026 | BTC and ETH spot depth, 0.01%; 0.03% | $0.91M; $1.76M | 2nd (leader $0.92M); 3rd |
July 2026 | BTC and ETH spot slippage, $100K sells | ETH 0.009%; BTC 0.004% | ETH lowest; BTC behind the leader |
July 2026 | Silver (XAG) futures depth, 0.01% and 0.03%; slippage, $100K and $300K sells | About $0.4M, about $1.0M; near 0%, 0.013% | 1st at both; tied lowest, lowest |
TokenInsight, August 2026, equity perps (5 exchanges) | Equity perpetuals listed; meaningful size at 100x on all five | 310; yes | Most in sample; only venue |
August 2026 | Five equity perpetuals, cumulative median depth, 0.01%; 0.05% and 0.10% | $0.52M; $2.81M and $5.99M | 1st; 2nd at both |
August 2026 | SPCX, SOXL, SK hynix slippage, $100K sells (P90) | 0.0112%, 0.0130%, 0.0170% (0.0230%, 0.0278%, 0.0241%) | Lowest on 3 of 5; 2nd SNDK, 3rd INTC |
TokenInsight, September 2026 (9 exchanges, no window given) | BTC and ETH futures depth, 0.03% | $21.03M | 1st |
September 2026 | BTC and ETH spot depth, 0.01%; 0.03% | About $1.35M; $3.58M | Tied 1st; 2nd |
September 2026 | BTC spot slippage, $500K sells; silver (XAG) futures slippage, $300K sells | 0.005%; 0.002% | Lowest; lowest |
CoinGecko 2026 spot study (8 exchanges) | SOL and DOGE depth at the market price | About $934K; over $443K | 1st; 1st |
CoinGecko 2026 | ETH depth within $3 of the price | About $450K | 8th of 8 |
Slippage figures are medians.
The September crypto exchange liquidity report
In TokenInsight's September 2026 report, which sampled nine exchanges, MEXC's combined BTC and ETH futures depth within 0.03% was $21.03 million, first in the sample.
MEXC's release of September 24, 2026 adds the lowest BTC spot slippage on a $500,000 sell, 0.005%, and the lowest silver futures slippage on a $300,000 sell, 0.002%.
The July crypto exchange liquidity report
TokenInsight's July 2026 report (nine exchanges, June 15 to July 14, 2026) ranked MEXC first for combined BTC and ETH futures depth within 0.03% at $15.71 million and third within 0.05%.
MEXC's release of August 4, 2026 adds the lowest ETH futures slippage in the sample and second place for BTC.
The May crypto exchange liquidity report
TokenInsight's May 2026 report (eight exchanges, April 1 to May 12, 2026) found the lowest silver futures slippage and the tightest silver bid-ask spread, 1.196 bps.
MEXC's release of June 1, 2026 also reports first for ETH futures slippage at every size and third for precious metals futures depth.
Update log
The latest TokenInsight report on this page is the September 2026 Crypto Exchange Liquidity Report, summarized by MEXC on September 24, 2026.
The CoinGecko 2026 spot study and MEXC's October 28, 2026 comparison were added in this revision.
This page is updated in place when TokenInsight publishes its next report.
Where does MEXC lead, and where does it rank second?
MEXC leads most often in the narrowest price bands and on silver, ETH and the newer stock futures, and ranks second or third once the band widens to 0.05% or the measure moves to spot depth within 0.03%, across the May, July, August and September 2026 TokenInsight reports.
In September 2026 MEXC was first for BTC and ETH futures depth within 0.03% but second for spot depth within 0.03%, and in August 2026 first for equity perpetuals depth within 0.01% but second at 0.05% and 0.10%.
MEXC's October 28, 2026 comparison shows the same shape: deeper near-price books on 10 of 10 core assets and 18 of 20 stock futures, but higher simulated slippage than the best other book on BTC at $500,000.
Liquidity also moves with the clock: weekend equity perpetuals volume in TokenInsight's August 2026 sample was 9.9% of the weekday level, and the weekend and off-hours liquidity guide covers what that does to a Saturday order.
How deep are MEXC's stock perpetual futures books?
MEXC's stock perpetual futures books held a cumulative median depth of $0.52 million within 0.01% of the mid price across the five sampled equity perpetuals in TokenInsight's August 2026 report, first in the five-exchange sample, with $2.81 million within 0.05% and $5.99 million within 0.10%, second at both.
The August 2026 Equity Perpetuals Market Report sampled five contracts on weekdays from July 29 to August 6, 2026; MEXC's median $100,000 slippage was lowest on three.
It counted 310 equity perpetuals on MEXC as of July 29, 2026, the most in the sample, listed by market in the guide to MEXC's stock futures coverage.
MEXC was also the only venue consistently supporting a meaningful position on all five contracts at 100x, a cap the guide to leverage tiers and position limits shows contract by contract.
Stock futures are one of three ways to trade US stocks on MEXC, and the Wall Street Without Walls pillar sets them beside RealStocks and tokenized stocks.
How does depth translate into what you pay on an order?
Depth translates into cost through slippage: a market order eats resting orders level by level, so the dollar cost equals order size times slippage in basis points divided by 10,000, and a thin book near the price raises that number.
At the SPCX median of 0.0112% in TokenInsight's August 2026 sample, a $100,000 sell costs about $11.20 (100,000 x 0.0112 ÷ 100 = 11.20); budget for the P90 fill of 0.0230% around news.
In MEXC's October 28, 2026 comparison, a $100,000 AAPL order showed $1.66 of simulated one-way slippage cost against $14.27 on the best other book, a saving of $12.61 or 88%.
As of November 2026, MEXC lists maker and taker fees from 0.00% on selected stock futures for eligible users; rates vary by region and promotion, and a pair returns to its standard rate when its 0-fee period or quota ends.
Fees, slippage and funding add up over a round trip, and the guide to your total trading cost on futures works the full example.
How can you check MEXC's depth yourself before trading?
You can check MEXC's depth in three places before you trade: the order book, which shows the size resting at each price, the depth chart, which stacks that size up around the mid price, and the risk-limit page, which shows the largest position each leverage tier allows.
The order book
Open the contract and look past the last price to the bid and ask ladders: thick, continuous rows near the mid price are near-price depth, and gaps are where a market order jumps.
The depth chart
The depth chart draws the same ladders as two curves, bids in green and asks in red, and a steep curve near the mid price is the 0.01% band in picture form.
The guide on how to read a depth chart walks through the axes and crossover point.
The risk-limit page
The MEXC risk-limit page lists each contract's maximum position per leverage tier, the cap TokenInsight's position-limit test measures.
MEXC's trading-hours guide marks the hours outside the regular US session as medium- or low-liquidity periods, when slippage can rise, so size down then.
Is exchange liquidity the same as trading volume, a liquidity score, or reserves?
Exchange liquidity is not the same as trading volume, a liquidity score or reserves: volume counts trades already done, a score blends inputs into one number, reserves show what an exchange holds, and liquidity is the resting size that decides your next fill.
An exchange-level liquidity score is a fair first screen, but it cannot show the 0.01% depth on the contract you trade.
Reserves answer a different question, whether client assets are backed, and MEXC publishes Proof of Reserves for that.
Proof of Reserves is a point-in-time snapshot verified by Hacken that covers only the listed assets and is provided for reference. It is not a full third-party financial audit and does not guarantee ongoing solvency.
FAQ
Is MEXC liquid?
MEXC ranked first for near-price depth or slippage in each of TokenInsight's four 2026 reports and in its own October 28, 2026 comparison, and second or third at wider bands.
Which exchange has the best liquidity for my order size?
No exchange was first on every market, band and order size in the 2026 reports covered here, so check depth and simulated slippage at your own size.
What is near-price depth?
Near-price depth is the dollar value of resting orders within a narrow band such as 0.01% of the mid price, the size a market order consumes first.
What is P90 slippage?
P90 slippage is the 90th-percentile fill, the cost one order in ten was worse than, a bad fill rather than a typical one.
Does lower slippage mean lower total cost?
Not by itself, because total cost adds fees and any funding to slippage, and a round trip pays slippage twice.
Where can you check an exchange's liquidity yourself?
Read the sizes at the best bid and ask and the next levels on the order book or depth chart, then check the position cap for your leverage on the risk-limit page.
Conclusion
Top 1 for whom?
The answer is the trader whose order fills close to the screen price, and the data above shows where MEXC's books did that and where they did not.
Check the live book against those figures before you size an order.
Disclaimer: this article is for information only and is not investment advice; futures trading carries a high risk of loss, so understand the risks before you trade.
Trading crypto assets is high-risk; prices can be highly volatile and you may lose everything you put in. No security measure removes all risk, and MEXC does not promise principal protection or absolute security. This article is not investment advice.
More MEXC Liquidity Guides
Market Opportunity
Orderly Network Price(ORDER)
$0.033
$0.033$0.033
USD
Orderly Network (ORDER) Live Price Chart
This article is provided by MEXC Research Team for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets involve significant risk. Please conduct independent research or consult a qualified professional before making any investment decisions. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of MEXC or its affiliates.
Related Articles
View More
Will Anthropic Join the Nasdaq-100 or the S&P 500? How Index Inclusion Works for ANT
Every large IPO brings the same follow-up question: will index funds have to buy it? For Anthropic, the answer depends on two very different rulebooks, the Nasdaq-100's and the S&P 500's. This guide
What Is Anthropic Tokenized Stock? How It Works Before and After the ANT IPO
"Anthropic tokenized stock" sounds like a share of Anthropic that lives on a blockchain. Before the ANT listing, it almost never is, and Anthropic itself has said why. This guide explains what
Anthropic IPO Price Per Share: How to Estimate It Before the Price Range Is Set
Everyone wants a number for the Anthropic IPO price per share, and the honest answer today is that Anthropic has not published one. What you can do is estimate a range with simple division, using the
MEXC On-Chain Daily Report: Citi Wealth Promotes Spot Bitcoin ETFs — Will Institutional Allocation Accelerate?
Updated: November 6, 2026, 09:30 (UTC+8) | Author: MEXC Headlines Tech stocks face a broad selloff after Democrats sweep Congress Fed and OCC assess banking impact from the Binance attack Citi Wealth
Popular Articles
View More
Can You Trade Stock Futures on Weekends? What Happens to Liquidity When Wall Street Is Closed
It's Saturday morning, a headline about a company you follow has just broken, and the order book for its stock future on MEXC is open, so yes, you can trade stock futures on weekends. The better
Is Volume the Same as Liquidity? Order Book Depth Explained, From 0.01% to 0.10% Bands
You pick a contract for its huge 24-hour volume, hit buy at the market, and the fill lands above the price you saw. Volume told you the market was busy; order book depth tells you what you can trade
Why Does a $100K Order Fill Worse Than $10K? Slippage in Futures Trading Explained
You see a price, you hit sell, and the fill comes back a shade worse than the screen said. That gap is slippage in futures trading, and it grows with order size, so a $100,000 order rarely fills the
Hot Crypto Updates
View More
How to Buy Monero (XMR)? Step-by-Step Guide with MEXC 0% Spot Fees and 4 Payment Methods Compared
Overview The fastest and most cost-effective way to buy Monero (XMR) is to complete Primary or Advanced KYC verification on MEXC, fund your account with USDT or USDC via the 0%-fee P2P escrow
Best Exchanges for Stock Perpetual Liquidity: Five Platforms Compared with MEXC Leading 0.01% Depth at $0.52M
Overview Across the five major centralized exchanges offering stock perpetual futures, MEXC ranks first in 0.01% (1 basis point) near-touch cumulative median order book depth at $0.52 million
Why Is MEXC the Best Exchange for Trading Silver Futures? 0.002% Slippage, $2.39M Near-Touch Depth, and 24/7 Zero-Fee Execution
Overview MEXC ranks as the best exchange globally for trading silver (XAG) perpetual futures because it achieved the lowest large-order slippage and deepest silver-specific near-touch order book
MEXC vs Hyperliquid Liquidity: $21.03M Near-Touch Depth, 10x Tighter Spreads, and Bitcoin and Ethereum Futures Compared
Overview In Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) perpetual futures execution, MEXC ranks first among nine major exchanges in 0.03% near-touch order book depth at $21.03 million, holding 36.20% ($5.59
Trending News
View More
Hyperliquid HIP-3: Can Payward Bring Perps to the US?
Payward, the parent company of Kraken, is pursuing a regulated pathway for bringing onchain perpetual futures to U.S. customers through Hyperliquid's HIP-3* infrastructure. The company announced its p
Does the Binance Security Incident Put Your Ethereum Wallet at Risk? EIP-7702 and Wallet Delegation Explained
The Binance security incident on October 30, 2026 has pushed a relatively technical Ethereum feature into a much broader security discussion: EIP-7702 wallet delegation. For ordinary Ethereum users, h
Sign Up & Receive Up to 10,000 USDT Bonus
Join the MEXC Community
Get the latest listings, events, and updates in real time, straight from our official Telegram channel.
25k+ members
