Recently, both the Bitcoin and Ethereum communities have been paying close attention to privacy. Zama, which develops fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology, has launched its testnet, and the mainnet is expected to follow soon. What changes will Zama bring to privacy in the crypto space? Let's discuss this briefly: To put it simply, Zama is like giving Ethereum and other public blockchains a "super invisibility cloak," allowing users to transfer funds, lend, trade, buy and sell stocks, participate in prediction markets, etc., all on-chain with all data encrypted and invisible to everyone, not even the participating nodes. However, computations can still be performed, and verifications can still be publicly verified. It's similar to bringing the WeChat Pay experience to the blockchain, but with even greater privacy because even WeChat can't see your balance or transfer amounts. Vitalik no longer needs to worry about people seeing how much ETH he transfers each time. Previous blockchains failed to achieve privacy for a simple reason: they were completely public, like a transparent glass house. How much money was in each address, who it was transferred to, and the amount transferred were all visible to the entire world. Because of this, institutions and companies were hesitant to invest real money. Zama's technology, Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), is designed to solve this problem. In short, Zama isn't a new blockchain, but rather a "privacy layer" superimposed on existing blockchains. Users can use privacy features without switching chains. This aligns with a point we've consistently emphasized: privacy shouldn't be a feature of a single chain, but rather an optional feature for all chains. The advantage of full-chain encryption is that encrypted data can still be directly computed (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) without decryption; furthermore, it offers high security and is resistant to quantum computing. Zama's privacy computing technology has many applications. For example, if you transfer 1000 USDC to a friend, people can currently see the address to which you transferred the money and the amount transferred. With Zama, others can only see "someone transferred money," without seeing the amount or balance. This has a wide range of applications in the current DeFi field. For example, people participating in contracts on Lighter, lending on Aave, and trading on Uniswap are much harder to detect. DAO voting also has advantages; regardless of whether a user votes for or against, the result is public, but who voted is confidential. Institutions have consistently expressed demand for putting assets like stocks on the blockchain, but they also have privacy concerns, especially regarding RWA (Real World Wide Web). The blockchaining of stocks, bonds, and funds has always posed privacy issues, and Zama's technology can address these concerns. Institutions don't want their activities to be exposed, and once this issue is resolved, the probability of large-scale blockchain deployment of traditional assets increases. Another area where on-chain identity has remained underdeveloped is Zama's privacy technology, which could facilitate its widespread adoption. Specifically, on-chain identity can prove someone's adulthood, driver's license status, nationality, etc., without revealing ID card/passport numbers, thus addressing the current problem of identity theft. On-chain identity is more convenient than physical identity and is less likely to be lost, making it suitable for cross-border travelers. For developers, they can still write code using the familiar Solidity. They only need to replace the ordinary "addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" with the "encrypted version of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" provided by Zama. It is not complicated. After modifying a few lines of code, DeFi and voting can achieve privacy without needing to understand specific cryptography. In short, it's somewhat like the internet upgrading from HTTP (plaintext) to HTTPS (encrypted transmission). Zama is attempting to upgrade the blockchain from being "completely transparent and naked" to being "cloaked in full encryption," which could help address the issue of large sums of money being put on-chain in RWA.Recently, both the Bitcoin and Ethereum communities have been paying close attention to privacy. Zama, which develops fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology, has launched its testnet, and the mainnet is expected to follow soon. What changes will Zama bring to privacy in the crypto space? Let's discuss this briefly: To put it simply, Zama is like giving Ethereum and other public blockchains a "super invisibility cloak," allowing users to transfer funds, lend, trade, buy and sell stocks, participate in prediction markets, etc., all on-chain with all data encrypted and invisible to everyone, not even the participating nodes. However, computations can still be performed, and verifications can still be publicly verified. It's similar to bringing the WeChat Pay experience to the blockchain, but with even greater privacy because even WeChat can't see your balance or transfer amounts. Vitalik no longer needs to worry about people seeing how much ETH he transfers each time. Previous blockchains failed to achieve privacy for a simple reason: they were completely public, like a transparent glass house. How much money was in each address, who it was transferred to, and the amount transferred were all visible to the entire world. Because of this, institutions and companies were hesitant to invest real money. Zama's technology, Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), is designed to solve this problem. In short, Zama isn't a new blockchain, but rather a "privacy layer" superimposed on existing blockchains. Users can use privacy features without switching chains. This aligns with a point we've consistently emphasized: privacy shouldn't be a feature of a single chain, but rather an optional feature for all chains. The advantage of full-chain encryption is that encrypted data can still be directly computed (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) without decryption; furthermore, it offers high security and is resistant to quantum computing. Zama's privacy computing technology has many applications. For example, if you transfer 1000 USDC to a friend, people can currently see the address to which you transferred the money and the amount transferred. With Zama, others can only see "someone transferred money," without seeing the amount or balance. This has a wide range of applications in the current DeFi field. For example, people participating in contracts on Lighter, lending on Aave, and trading on Uniswap are much harder to detect. DAO voting also has advantages; regardless of whether a user votes for or against, the result is public, but who voted is confidential. Institutions have consistently expressed demand for putting assets like stocks on the blockchain, but they also have privacy concerns, especially regarding RWA (Real World Wide Web). The blockchaining of stocks, bonds, and funds has always posed privacy issues, and Zama's technology can address these concerns. Institutions don't want their activities to be exposed, and once this issue is resolved, the probability of large-scale blockchain deployment of traditional assets increases. Another area where on-chain identity has remained underdeveloped is Zama's privacy technology, which could facilitate its widespread adoption. Specifically, on-chain identity can prove someone's adulthood, driver's license status, nationality, etc., without revealing ID card/passport numbers, thus addressing the current problem of identity theft. On-chain identity is more convenient than physical identity and is less likely to be lost, making it suitable for cross-border travelers. For developers, they can still write code using the familiar Solidity. They only need to replace the ordinary "addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" with the "encrypted version of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" provided by Zama. It is not complicated. After modifying a few lines of code, DeFi and voting can achieve privacy without needing to understand specific cryptography. In short, it's somewhat like the internet upgrading from HTTP (plaintext) to HTTPS (encrypted transmission). Zama is attempting to upgrade the blockchain from being "completely transparent and naked" to being "cloaked in full encryption," which could help address the issue of large sums of money being put on-chain in RWA.

How does Zama give blockchain a "quantum invisibility suit"?

2025/11/27 18:00
4 min read

Recently, both the Bitcoin and Ethereum communities have been paying close attention to privacy. Zama, which develops fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology, has launched its testnet, and the mainnet is expected to follow soon. What changes will Zama bring to privacy in the crypto space? Let's discuss this briefly:

To put it simply, Zama is like giving Ethereum and other public blockchains a "super invisibility cloak," allowing users to transfer funds, lend, trade, buy and sell stocks, participate in prediction markets, etc., all on-chain with all data encrypted and invisible to everyone, not even the participating nodes. However, computations can still be performed, and verifications can still be publicly verified. It's similar to bringing the WeChat Pay experience to the blockchain, but with even greater privacy because even WeChat can't see your balance or transfer amounts. Vitalik no longer needs to worry about people seeing how much ETH he transfers each time.

Previous blockchains failed to achieve privacy for a simple reason: they were completely public, like a transparent glass house. How much money was in each address, who it was transferred to, and the amount transferred were all visible to the entire world. Because of this, institutions and companies were hesitant to invest real money. Zama's technology, Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), is designed to solve this problem.

In short, Zama isn't a new blockchain, but rather a "privacy layer" superimposed on existing blockchains. Users can use privacy features without switching chains. This aligns with a point we've consistently emphasized: privacy shouldn't be a feature of a single chain, but rather an optional feature for all chains. The advantage of full-chain encryption is that encrypted data can still be directly computed (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) without decryption; furthermore, it offers high security and is resistant to quantum computing.

Zama's privacy computing technology has many applications. For example, if you transfer 1000 USDC to a friend, people can currently see the address to which you transferred the money and the amount transferred. With Zama, others can only see "someone transferred money," without seeing the amount or balance. This has a wide range of applications in the current DeFi field. For example, people participating in contracts on Lighter, lending on Aave, and trading on Uniswap are much harder to detect. DAO voting also has advantages; regardless of whether a user votes for or against, the result is public, but who voted is confidential.

Institutions have consistently expressed demand for putting assets like stocks on the blockchain, but they also have privacy concerns, especially regarding RWA (Real World Wide Web). The blockchaining of stocks, bonds, and funds has always posed privacy issues, and Zama's technology can address these concerns. Institutions don't want their activities to be exposed, and once this issue is resolved, the probability of large-scale blockchain deployment of traditional assets increases.

Another area where on-chain identity has remained underdeveloped is Zama's privacy technology, which could facilitate its widespread adoption. Specifically, on-chain identity can prove someone's adulthood, driver's license status, nationality, etc., without revealing ID card/passport numbers, thus addressing the current problem of identity theft. On-chain identity is more convenient than physical identity and is less likely to be lost, making it suitable for cross-border travelers.

For developers, they can still write code using the familiar Solidity. They only need to replace the ordinary "addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" with the "encrypted version of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" provided by Zama. It is not complicated. After modifying a few lines of code, DeFi and voting can achieve privacy without needing to understand specific cryptography.

In short, it's somewhat like the internet upgrading from HTTP (plaintext) to HTTPS (encrypted transmission). Zama is attempting to upgrade the blockchain from being "completely transparent and naked" to being "cloaked in full encryption," which could help address the issue of large sums of money being put on-chain in RWA.

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.002999
$0.002999$0.002999
-0.66%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Ripple CEO Predicts 80 Percent Odds CLARITY Act Passes by April in Potential Game Changer for Crypto Regulation

Ripple CEO Predicts 80 Percent Odds CLARITY Act Passes by April in Potential Game Changer for Crypto Regulation

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Says There Is an 80 Percent Chance the CLARITY Act Passes by the End of April Ripple Chief Executive Officer Brad Garlinghouse has
Share
Hokanews2026/02/17 22:07
XRP Price Prediction: Ripple Clings to a Descending Channel, Cardano Waits for a Catalyst, and DeepSnitch AI Prepares for Launch in February, With 1000x in Sight

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple Clings to a Descending Channel, Cardano Waits for a Catalyst, and DeepSnitch AI Prepares for Launch in February, With 1000x in Sight

OKX has secured a Payment Institution license in Malta, clearing the way to offer MiCA compliant stablecoin services across the European Union. That gives it a
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/17 22:30