NFT

NFTs are unique digital identifiers recorded on a blockchain that certify ownership and authenticity of a specific asset. Moving past the "PFP" craze, 2026 NFTs emphasize utility, representing everything from IP rights and digital fashion to RWA titles and event ticketing. This tag explores the technical standards of digital ownership, the growth of NFT marketplaces, and the integration of non-fungible tech into the broader Creator Economy and enterprise solutions.

13065 Articles
Created: 2026/02/02 18:52
Updated: 2026/02/02 18:52
$28M Bittensor Hack Linked to NFTs by ZachXBT

$28M Bittensor Hack Linked to NFTs by ZachXBT

The post $28M Bittensor Hack Linked to NFTs by ZachXBT appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Investigator Follows the Trail Through Mixers and Privacy Networks On-chain investigator ZachXBT has uncovered new evidence in one of the largest crypto hacks of 2024 — the attack on the Bittensor protocol, which led to the theft of approximately $28 million in TAO tokens. Despite the hacker’s use of Railgun’s privacy system, ZachXBT successfully traced the movement of the stolen funds, eventually identifying a key suspect linked to the operation. According to the analyst, the attackers initially withdrew assets through instant exchanges, converting them into Monero. Later, they transferred about $5 million to Railgun using Ethereum, USDC, and WETH. While Railgun, much like Tornado Cash, promotes itself as a tool for private transactions, it has also been exploited to conceal stolen crypto assets. Source: ZachXBT How NFTs Helped Hide the Trail ZachXBT’s investigation relied on precise timing and value matching to connect deposits and withdrawals within the Railgun system. “Unique denominations and short intervals between transactions ensure reliable de-mixing,” he explained. After the withdrawals, the stolen assets were divided among three wallets that were later used to buy and resell anime-themed NFTs. While fake NFT trading is uncommon for laundering crypto, in this case it helped disguise the transfers. Purchased NFTs. Source: ZachXBT One of these addresses was tied to a Bittensor user known as Rusty, creator of Skrtt Racing — a project that allowed cryptocurrency betting on Hot Wheels–style toy races. ZachXBT later determined that the individual, identified in court records as Ayden B, denied involvement in the hack but confirmed ownership of the wallets connected to the suspicious transactions. The investigator expressed hope that the evidence collected could form the basis of a criminal case. Source: https://coinpaper.com/11724/zach-xbt-traces-28-million-bittensor-hack-to-nft-purchases

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews
Best Crypto Trends: 5 Top Altcoins to Buy This Week (October 2025) as MoonBull Fuels the Market Wildfire

Best Crypto Trends: 5 Top Altcoins to Buy This Week (October 2025) as MoonBull Fuels the Market Wildfire

Top altcoins to join this week features MoonBull presale, SOL, XRP, BZIL, CULEX, discover top 100x meme projects and 100x crypto coins now!

Author: Blockchainreporter
Tapzi Rises Among the Best Crypto Presales of 2025 — With Bitcoin Hyper in the Mix

Tapzi Rises Among the Best Crypto Presales of 2025 — With Bitcoin Hyper in the Mix

Tapzi’s skill-based GameFi presale is winning attention in 2025, with real gameplay, solid tokenomics, and 3× early ROI potential—analysts call it a 100× contender.

Author: Blockchainreporter
Top 5 Upcoming Crypto Presales in 2025 That Could Change the Game

Top 5 Upcoming Crypto Presales in 2025 That Could Change the Game

Discover the top 5 upcoming crypto presales of 2025 poised to disrupt the market. Explore early projects with massive growth and profit potential.

Author: Blockchainreporter
Paxos Technical Error Creates $300 Trillion PYUSD: Confirms Mint Was Internal Error, Not a Hack

Paxos Technical Error Creates $300 Trillion PYUSD: Confirms Mint Was Internal Error, Not a Hack

The post Paxos Technical Error Creates $300 Trillion PYUSD: Confirms Mint Was Internal Error, Not a Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. At 3:12 PM EST, blockchain watchers froze as Paxos, the regulated issuer behind PayPal USD (PYUSD), mistakenly minted $300 trillion worth of PYUSD in a single transaction. Just 22 minutes later, the entire amount was burned, as if it never happened. The company quickly issued a statement clarifying the cause: “This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root cause.” @Paxos, October 15, 2025 At 3:12 PM EST, Paxos mistakenly minted excess PYUSD as part of an internal transfer. Paxos immediately identified the error and burned the excess PYUSD. This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root… — Paxos (@Paxos) October 15, 2025 What Really Happened The massive mint originated from Paxos’ official wallet, confirming it was an internal mistake, not a hack. According to on-chain data, the tokens were created in a single transaction, likely due to a configuration or input error, something as simple as typing the wrong number during an internal test or system update. On Ethereum, the mint and burn were both visible to the public, allowing anyone to track the sequence in real time. The transparency of blockchain made the event both shocking and oddly reassuring, a trillion-dollar error that everyone could see, and everyone could verify was fixed. Within minutes, crypto Twitter exploded. Analysts and traders scrambled to confirm whether the $300 trillion mint was real, while others joked that PayPal had briefly overtaken Apple, Microsoft, and even entire global economies in value. “For about 20 minutes, PayPal was the richest company on Earth.” @pukerrainbrow For about 20 minutes, PayPal became the richest company on Earth. Paxos accidentally minted $300 trillion in PYUSD… before burning it all like nothing happened. But…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews
Solana vs XRP: Comparing Their Key Features

Solana vs XRP: Comparing Their Key Features

Solana and XRP are two of the fastest and most popular blockchain platforms, but they solve very different problems. Solana focuses on high-speed transactions and low fees, making it popular for decentralized applications like NFTs and DeFi. XRP, on the other hand, is known for enabling quick and efficient cross-border payments, with many banks and financial institutions using its network.Both have strong communities, unique use cases, and potential for growth. Understanding their differences helps investors and users decide which best fits their goals.What is Solana (SOL)?Solana is a high-performance blockchain platform that is designed to support decentralized applications (dApps) and crypto assets with a focus on scalability, speed, and low transaction costs. It was launched in March of 2020 by Anatoly Yakovenko, a former Qualcomm engineer, and introduced a unique consensus mechanism called Proof of History (PoH), which works alongside Proof of Stake (PoS) to dramatically increase throughput. This innovation allows the network to process thousands of transactions per second — which is far more than most other blockchains. Solana’s ecosystem quickly became one of the most active in the crypto industry, powering projects in DeFi, NFTs, and gaming. Its native token, SOL, is used for transaction fees, staking, and network governance.What is Ripple (XRP)?Ripple (XRP), on the other hand, is both a blockchain-based payment protocol and the name of the digital currency used in it. It was founded in 2012 by Chris Larsen and Jed McCaleb with the goal of enabling fast, low-cost international money transfers between financial institutions. Unlike traditional blockchains, Ripple uses a consensus ledger rather than mining to validate transactions, allowing settlements to occur in just a few seconds. The company behind it, Ripple Labs, focuses on bridging traditional finance and blockchain technology through its products like RippleNet and On-Demand Liquidity (ODL). The XRP token serves as a bridge currency for cross-border payments, aiming to make global financial transfers more efficient and affordable.Solana vs XRP: Key DifferencesCATEGORYSOLANA (SOL)RIPPLE (XRP)Launch Year20202012Founder(s)Anatoly YakovenkoChris Larsen ans Jed McCalebPrimary PurposeGeneral-purpose blockchain for dApps, DeFi, and NFTs.Cross-border payments and liquidity bridge for financial institutions.Consensus MechanismProof of History + Proof of Stake.Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm (RPCA).Transaction SpeedUp to 65,000 transaction per second (TPS).1,500 TPS, with 3-5 second settlements.Transaction Fees$0.00025 (extremely low)$0.0002 (also extremely low)Smart Contract SupportFull support for smart contracts.Limited, mainly focused on payments, not dApps.DecentralizationHundreds of validators, but high hardware requirements.Around 150 validators, with Ripple Labs influencing default list.Network ReliabilityVery fast, but occasional outages during high traffic.Highly reliable, minimal outages.Main Use CasesDeFi platforms, NFT marketplaces, Web3 gaming, and dApps.General remittances, bank transfers, and liquidity management.Ecosystem FocusDeveloper-driven ecosystem with open-source growth.Institutional and banking partnerships through Ripple Net.Regulatory OutlookNo direct SEC lawsuit but under general scrutiny.Faced and resolved SEC lawsuit; clearer regulatory standing.Frequently Asked QuestionsWhat are the main differences in transaction speeds between Solana and XRP?Solana processes transactions very quickly, handling up to thousands of transactions per second. It is known for low latency and high-speed block confirmations.XRP also offers fast transaction speeds, especially for cross-border payments, with transfers completing in seconds. Both networks aim for speed, but Solana’s focus is on scaling for a wide range of applications, while XRP is tailored for quick payment settlements.How do Solana's and XRP's approaches to scalability compare?Solana uses a unique proof-of-history mechanism to help scale its network and manage more transactions at once. This system allows it to support decentralized finance (DeFi), apps, and NFTs alongside regular transfers.XRP relies on a simpler consensus protocol called the XRP Ledger. This setup focuses on stability and payment processing, which scales less flexibly compared to Solana’s broad use-case approach.What are the factors affecting the price predictions of Solana and XRP?The price of Solana is influenced by growth in decentralized applications, partnerships, and network upgrades. Demand from developers and DeFi projects can also move Solana’s price.XRP’s price depends on regulatory news, adoption by banks, and the growth of its payment network. Legal decisions about XRP’s status can have a big impact on its future value.Which offers better long-term investment potential: Solana or XRP?Solana appeals to those interested in a growing community of apps and NFT projects. Its ecosystem is expanding, but risks include technical issues and network outages.XRP is more established in the payments space and has support from some financial institutions. Its future depends heavily on legal clarity and global adoption for payments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of Solana and XRP in terms of overall network performance?Solana’s advantages include fast speeds, high capacity, and support for many types of applications. However, it has faced network outages and technical challenges during periods of heavy activity.XRP is valued for its uptime, reliability, and stable performance in payments. It lacks support for advanced apps but is less prone to network slowdowns or failures. Both have trade-offs based on what users and developers need.

Author: Coinstats
This $0.0035 New Crypto Stands Out

This $0.0035 New Crypto Stands Out

The post This $0.0035 New Crypto Stands Out appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News As investors hunt for the best altcoins to buy now for October, PEPE is down 31% and FLOKI is down 40%, showcasing meme coins lose momentum. Meanwhile, Tapzi leads as a promising contender. Meme coins that powered portfolios through 2024 are stumbling in October 2025. PEPE trades at $0.00000754, down 31% year-to-date, while FLOKI hovers near $0.0000745 after sliding 40% from January highs. Whale selling pressure and thinning liquidity have pushed both tokens into bearish territory. Investors who rode the speculation wave now face a difficult question: stay with hype-driven assets or pivot to projects with tangible revenue models? Tapzi, a skill-based gaming platform on BNB Smart Chain, has emerged as an answer for those seeking utility over volatility.​ The presale has sold over 81 million tokens from a 150 million allocation, representing 54% completion. Unlike meme coins that rely on social buzz, Tapzi generates value through player-funded prize pools and staking mechanics. Games like Chess and Checkers reward skill, not speculation. With tokens priced at $0.0035 ahead of a $0.01 launch, early participants position for a 185% markup before public trading begins, making Tapzi one of the best altcoins to buy now for explosive Q4 returns.​ Key Takeaways PEPE fell 31% YTD to $0.00000754 while FLOKI dropped 40% as whale selling and weak technicals pressure meme coins downward​. Tapzi sold 81M tokens at $0.0035 presale price ahead of $0.01 launch, offering 185% markup to early investors via skill-gaming platform​. Web3 gaming market projected to grow from $25B in 2024 to $125B by 2032 as Tapzi targets first-mover advantage in competitive GameFi​. Meme Coins Face Structural Headwinds PEPE dropped 25% over the past week following whale liquidations exceeding 1.5 trillion tokens. Trading volume surged to $927 million as holders exited positions during a broader market correction. The token…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews
AI-powered contracts: Rewiring Bitcoin mining’s future

AI-powered contracts: Rewiring Bitcoin mining’s future

The post AI-powered contracts: Rewiring Bitcoin mining’s future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > AI-powered contracts: Rewiring Bitcoin mining’s future In the tough world of block reward mining, where costs for power and keeping machines running play a critical role in profitability, artificial intelligence (AI) smart contracts provide some much-needed support. These aren’t your everyday blockchain agreements that simply split block rewards, but intelligent, self-executing codes that crunch real-time data, energy prices, rig temperatures, or network difficulty, and make split-second decisions to keep miners on track. With the blockchain and AI market heating up, the fusion of AI and decentralized tech could birth a new breed of self-optimizing mining operations, redefining efficiency in the cutthroat world of 2025. Smart contracts have been a key part of the blockchain for a while, automating things such as decentralized finance (DeFi) loans and non-fungible token (NFT) sales. Adding AI to them is like giving them a brain; instead of sticking to preset rules, these contracts can adapt, learning from live data to improve mining efficiency. Companies like Fetch.ai and Chainlink are paving the way by feeding real-time data such as weather, grid costs, or hashrate trends into Ethereum contracts that miners can use. For example, imagine a North Dakota mining farm where power costs change often. An AI contract could see when prices go up and then decide to throttle older machines. Electricity expenses are a key player in mining, but these costs are increasing. By 2025, miners in the United States could see rates over $0.10 per kWh, much higher than the $0.03-$0.07 rates in places such as Oman. To deal with this, AI contracts can study data from power grids or renewable sources to help control electricity usage. For instance, a miner in Texas could use an AI contract tied to ERCOT’s pricing. This would let them move operations…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews
Ripple CLO Clarifies the Misconception Around Bitcoin Decentralization

Ripple CLO Clarifies the Misconception Around Bitcoin Decentralization

The post Ripple CLO Clarifies the Misconception Around Bitcoin Decentralization  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Chief Legal Officer at Ripple, Stuart Alderoty, explained the misconception of decentralization in crypto. In his latest X post, Alderoty said the idea of decentralization is not unique to Bitcoin, just because it doesn’t have a CEO. Decentralization is not Unique to Bitcoin According to Alderoty, the idea of decentralization is based on permissionless systems, …

Author: CoinPedia
Venom Foundation: blockchain fees drop below a cent

Venom Foundation: blockchain fees drop below a cent

The Venom Foundation has published a comparative research on the transaction fees of the world's top ten blockchains.

Author: The Cryptonomist