ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvent Center
More
ICP Zero-Fee Gala

Oracle

Oracles are essential infrastructure components that feed real-time, off-chain data (such as price feeds, weather, or sports results) into blockchain smart contracts. Without decentralized oracles like Chainlink and Pyth, DeFi could not function. In 2026, oracles have evolved to support verifiable randomness and cross-chain data synchronization. This tag covers the technical evolution of data availability, tamper-proof price feeds, and the critical role oracles play in ensuring the deterministic execution of complex decentralized applications.

5118 Articles
Created: 2026/02/02 18:52
Updated: 2026/02/02 18:52
Base-Solana Bridge Goes Live as Chainlink Secures Cross-Chain Transfers

Base-Solana Bridge Goes Live as Chainlink Secures Cross-Chain Transfers

TLDR: Base-Solana Bridge launch adds native Solana asset support for users across multiple Base applications. Chainlink CCIP provides verified cross-chain messaging to secure all Base-Solana asset transfers. Developers can now integrate SOL and SPL tokens directly into Base applications without extra tools. The new bridge enables two-way liquidity flow between Base and Solana for broader [...] The post Base-Solana Bridge Goes Live as Chainlink Secures Cross-Chain Transfers appeared first on Blockonomi.

Author: Blockonomi

2025/12/05

Base-Solana bridge secured by Coinbase and Chainlink launches

Base-Solana bridge secured by Coinbase and Chainlink launches

The post Base-Solana bridge secured by Coinbase and Chainlink launches appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Base and Solana have taken a step toward cross-chain access with a new connection now live on mainnet. Summary A Base-Solana bridge secured by Chainlink CCIP and Coinbase validators has been launched. Users can move SOL and SPL tokens into Base apps and access multi-chain liquidity. Coinbase’s Solana strategy and future CCIP integrations point to wider network expansion. The new bridge is now live on mainnet and secured through Chainlink’s cross-chain interoperability protocol and Coinbase-operated infrastructure. In a Dec. 4 announcement, Base said the new connection allows anyone to move assets between Base and Solana using a mechanism jointly verified by Chainlink CCIP nodes and Coinbase. Bridge launch marks new phase for Base’s cross-chain strategy The setup uses a dedicated cross-chain oracle to validate messages independently, providing a safer path for transfers involving Solana (SOL) and any SPL token. The bridge is already rolling out inside applications including Zora, Aerodrome, Virtuals, Flaunch, and Relay. Users can deposit SOL directly into Base apps, trade Solana-native assets, and bring any Solana token into the Base environment. Base assets can also move in the opposite direction, giving Solana users access to Ethereum-aligned liquidity and tooling. Base said the bridge reflects its long-standing push to avoid “island” chains and instead support easy discovery of applications across networks. The team framed asset mobility as a requirement for onboarding mainstream users, who expect transfers to move at the speed of the internet and across any app they choose. New activity expected across liquidity and hybrid dApps For developers, the Base-Solana bridge creates new ways to build hybrid applications that leverage Solana’s speed while remaining inside Ethereum’s composable environment. The implementation is fully open-source on GitHub and available for any developer to integrate. This lets projects add native SOL and SPL support without relying on wrappers or…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/12/05

Base and Solana unlock asset transfers with new bridge secured by Chainlink and Coinbase

Base and Solana unlock asset transfers with new bridge secured by Chainlink and Coinbase

Base and Solana have taken a step toward cross-chain access with a new connection now live on mainnet. The new bridge is now live on mainnet and secured through Chainlink’s cross-chain interoperability protocol and Coinbase-operated infrastructure. In a Dec. 4…

Author: Crypto.news

2025/12/05

Base Launches Chainlink Bridge to Solana, Potentially Enabling SOL Cross-Chain Transfers

Base Launches Chainlink Bridge to Solana, Potentially Enabling SOL Cross-Chain Transfers

The post Base Launches Chainlink Bridge to Solana, Potentially Enabling SOL Cross-Chain Transfers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Base Solana bridge, secured by Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), enables seamless asset transfers between Base and Solana blockchains. Launched on mainnet, it supports trading of SOL and SPL tokens on Base while boosting liquidity across these high-throughput networks known for low fees. Bridge Launch: Base and Solana now connected via Chainlink technology for cross-chain transfers. Integration in apps like Zora and Aerodrome allows users to access Solana assets natively on Base. Market Data: Solana holds $9 billion in locked value, Base $4.5 billion, per DefiLlama statistics. Discover how the Base Solana bridge unlocks cross-chain liquidity for SOL and SPL tokens. Explore seamless transfers, low-fee trading, and multichain opportunities on Ethereum L2 and Solana. Start bridging assets today for enhanced DeFi access. What is the Base Solana Bridge? The Base Solana bridge is a newly launched connection between Coinbase’s Ethereum Layer-2 blockchain Base and the Solana blockchain, secured by Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP). This bridge facilitates direct asset transfers, allowing users to move tokens like Solana’s SOL and SPL tokens between the two networks without intermediaries. By enabling this interoperability, it addresses key challenges in the blockchain ecosystem, such as fragmented liquidity and the need for multiple wallets. How Does Chainlink’s CCIP Secure the Base Solana Bridge? The Base Solana bridge relies on Chainlink’s CCIP to ensure secure and reliable cross-chain operations. CCIP acts as a standardized protocol for messaging and token transfers across diverse blockchains, mitigating risks like oracle manipulation or failed transactions. According to Chainlink’s documentation, CCIP has processed over $10 billion in cross-chain volume since its inception, demonstrating its robustness in real-world applications. This integration is particularly significant because Base operates on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), while Solana uses a non-EVM architecture. Chainlink’s technology bridges this gap by providing verifiable security through decentralized oracles,…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/12/05

Base-Solana Bridge Goes Live, Potentially Unlocking SOL Transfers and Unified Liquidity

Base-Solana Bridge Goes Live, Potentially Unlocking SOL Transfers and Unified Liquidity

The post Base-Solana Bridge Goes Live, Potentially Unlocking SOL Transfers and Unified Liquidity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Base-Solana bridge enables seamless asset transfers between the two blockchains, secured by Chainlink’s CCIP and operated by Coinbase and Chainlink nodes for reliability. Launched on mainnet, it supports bidirectional movement of tokens like SOL and memecoins, fostering unified liquidity pools across ecosystems. Seamless interoperability: Users can transfer assets from Solana to Base without centralized exchanges, enhancing cross-chain efficiency. Security through verification: Independent node operators from Coinbase and Chainlink ensure safe token movements. Expanded applications: Integrates with apps like Zora and AerodromeFi, supporting over 1,000 daily active users on Base as of recent metrics. Discover the Base-Solana bridge’s impact on crypto interoperability. Learn how it unlocks liquidity for SOL and memecoins, boosting DeFi efficiency. Explore key features and future expansions today. What is the Base-Solana Bridge? The Base-Solana bridge is a secure infrastructure that facilitates direct asset transfers between the Base and Solana blockchains, eliminating the need for intermediaries. Built on Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) and supported by Coinbase, it allows users to move tokens bidirectionally with verified safety. This launch on mainnet, as announced via Base’s official X page, represents a pivotal advancement in blockchain connectivity, enabling native trading of Solana assets on Base. How Does the Base-Solana Bridge Enhance Cross-Chain Security? The Base-Solana bridge prioritizes security through a decentralized verification process involving Chainlink CCIP and custom cross-chain oracles. Coinbase and Chainlink Labs serve as independent node operators, each validating messages to prevent unauthorized transfers. This setup ensures that all token movements, from standard assets like SOL to niche memecoins such as CHILLHOUSE and TRENCHER, occur without compromise. According to data from Chainlink Labs, CCIP has processed over 10 million cross-chain transactions across various networks with zero security incidents reported in the past year. This reliability stems from rate-limiting mechanisms and anomaly detection, which safeguard against exploits common…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/12/05

Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP Draws $42M Inflows on Debut as LINK Trading Surges

Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP Draws $42M Inflows on Debut as LINK Trading Surges

The post Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP Draws $42M Inflows on Debut as LINK Trading Surges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP, ticker GLNK, attracted $42 million in inflows on its debut trading day, boosting total assets to $64 million amid surging Chainlink trading volume and growing interest in regulated LINK exposure. Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP debut drew $42M in inflows and lifted total assets to about $64M despite a slow market. Strong first-day trading showed firm liquidity as LINK volume and price climbed sharply. Interest in regulated Chainlink products grew, with GLNK and CLNK expanding market access; LINK price rose over six percent following the launch. Discover how Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP launch drew $42M inflows, signaling strong demand for regulated LINK products. Explore impacts on Chainlink trading and future access in this detailed analysis. Stay informed on crypto ETP trends. What is Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP and how did it perform on launch? Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP, trading under the ticker GLNK on NYSE Arca, is the first U.S. exchange-traded product directly holding Chainlink’s native LINK token. It provides regulated access to Chainlink without the need for personal wallets or private keys, allowing investors to trade through standard brokerage accounts. On its debut, the ETP saw robust demand with $42 million in inflows, elevating total assets under management to approximately $64 million, even as the broader cryptocurrency market experienced sluggish conditions. The launch underscores Chainlink’s appeal as a key infrastructure provider in the blockchain ecosystem, particularly for oracle services and data feeds essential to decentralized finance. Analysts highlighted the product’s quick uptake, attributing it to increasing institutional interest in tokenized assets and secure data solutions. This performance positions GLNK as a significant entry point for traditional investors seeking exposure to Chainlink’s growing network. How has the launch of GLNK influenced Chainlink’s market dynamics? The introduction of Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP has notably boosted Chainlink’s trading activity, with LINK’s volume surging more than…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/12/05

Risk control is the lifeline: Analyzing the underlying game theory of Perp DEX through the Hyperliquid incident.

Risk control is the lifeline: Analyzing the underlying game theory of Perp DEX through the Hyperliquid incident.

Perpetual contracts are the most valuable and frequently traded products in the on-chain financial ecosystem, but they also pose the most significant systemic risks. In March 2025, Hyperliquid's HLP pool suffered significant losses due to whales using excessive leverage and repeatedly withdrawing collateral on the platform, exposing structural weaknesses in its mark-price mechanism and liquidation process. Such events remind us that beyond superficial trading depth and user growth, the true stability of Perp DEX ultimately stems from the resilience of its risk model under extreme market conditions. Whether it's market maker losses, liquidation cascades, or systemic risks triggered by individual actions, they are all directly related to the same core issue: how the protocol is priced, how risk is allocated, and how leverage and liquidation are handled. Therefore, without understanding the risk control architecture, one cannot truly understand Perp DEX's competitive advantage. This article will start with the "risk model" and systematically break down the core architecture, sources of risk, differences in risk control, and future trends of Perp DEX, providing a professional and comprehensive analytical framework for funds, quantitative traders, and Web3 investors. Perp DEX's Risk Model: The Protocol's Lifeline The risk model is the protocol's dynamic risk control hub, determining its survival under extreme market conditions. It is similar to the risk engine in traditional finance, but more complex because on-chain systems cannot be subject to temporary manual intervention. A mature Perp DEX risk model is a system composed of multiple core components, and its architecture and interrelationships are shown in the following diagram: Figure 1: (This figure illustrates how the risk model starts with price inputs, is processed through the core risk control layer, and ultimately outputs the overall stability and capital efficiency of the system through the risk buffer layer. It reveals the intrinsic connections between modules such as the price model, margin rules, liquidation mechanism, and insurance fund.) These modules together form the protocol's "risk skeleton." A weakness in any one of these components could lead to structural failures during major market movements. LPs or market makers may experience uncontrollable losses (common in AMM models). The agreement was insolvent, and the insurance fund was quickly depleted. Delayed liquidation triggered a chain reaction of margin calls and widespread losses. Oracle was manipulated, triggering an arbitrage attack. The uncontrolled risk of a multi-asset, multi-leverage portfolio led to a total margin call. In other words, the risk model determines how much capital a protocol can support, what types of traders it can serve, and whether it can survive in extreme market conditions. Therefore, the risk model ultimately determines the upper limit of all indicators such as trading experience, market depth, capital efficiency, protocol revenue, and token value capture. This is why, in the past two years, competition in Perp DEX has shifted to underlying risk control architecture, rather than just transaction mining or fee wars. Breakdown of core modules of mainstream PERP architecture and risk model The architectural evolution of Perp DEX is essentially a path of "how risk is redistributed". Phase 1 (Off-chain Order Book): The risk lies in the robustness of the centralized matching nodes. Represented by dYdX, this design ensures transaction efficiency, but the risk is highly concentrated on the availability and security of off-chain matching. Phase Two (AMM): Risk is transferred to the directional exposure of the liquidity pool. For example, in GMX, under the AMM model, LPs bear extremely strong directional risk, making permanent loss, extreme market deviations, and MEV (Mean Equity) unavoidable issues for this architecture. The third stage (On-Chain Order Book - CLOB): Risk shifts to reliance on the performance and determinism of the underlying public blockchain. A representative project is Hyperliquid, where 70-80% of perpetual transaction volume is now concentrated in the order book model. This high-performance on-chain environment also means an unprecedented reliance on TPS, mempool stability, and contract execution security. Frontier Exploration (Hybrid Mode): The risk lies in the logic and feedback loop of the dynamic switching between the order book and liquidity pool. Taking Drift on Solana as an example, it uses AMM as a deep backup mechanism and automatically replenishes quotes when the order book lacks liquidity, thereby finding a new balance between execution quality and capital efficiency. The differences between the different architectures are ultimately reflected in the design of the following four core risk control modules: 2.1. Price Model: The System's Benchmark The price model determines the fairness of transactions, liquidation triggers, and funding rates, serving as the underlying benchmark for perpetual contract systems. It faces challenges such as oracle latency, manipulation, and MEV (Mean Equity). Mature systems employ multi-source aggregation, TWAP (Transfer-Only-Pay), and maximum deviation limits to enhance resistance to attacks. AMM (Automated Market Maker) architectures also require internal pricing mechanisms to simulate liquidity depth, a core variable in their risk exposure. 2.2. Liquidation Model: A Key Risk Buffer The liquidation mechanism determines the system's ability to withstand price fluctuations and is the most critical risk buffer layer of a perpetual protocol. Its security boundary consists of the initial margin, maintenance margin, and liquidation buffer. The execution logic (partial liquidation, full liquidation, auction) directly impacts user experience and system efficiency. Liquidation itself also faces attack surfaces such as on-chain congestion and bid manipulation. 2.3. Insurance Funds: The Last Line of Defense The insurance fund is used to absorb losses from margin calls. Its size and usage rules directly reflect the agreement's risk tolerance and serve as the system's "last line of defense" in extreme market conditions. The design needs to balance security and capital efficiency: too large a size will affect returns, while too small a size will easily trigger automatic liquidation, damaging the agreement's reputation. 2.4. Position Management: The System's Global Risk Controller Position management ensures the system doesn't spiral out of control due to excessive concentration of one-sided positions. Mechanisms such as position limits, dynamic margin requirements, and funding rates are used to regulate market forces. For multi-asset and long-tail assets, managing correlation and manipulation risks presents even greater challenges. Risk model trade-off analysis in mainstream cases Current mainstream platforms are transitioning towards CLOB or CLOB-Centric hybrid solutions to achieve better matching accuracy and capital efficiency. The table below systematically compares the risk model characteristics and core trade-offs of four representative projects: Chart 2 (This chart compares Hyperliquid, Aster, edgeX, and Lighter side-by-side from six dimensions: core architecture, pricing model, liquidation mechanism, insurance fund, major risks, and core trade-offs, demonstrating the risk preferences and trade-offs under different technology routes.) Key points of case analysis: Hyperliquid achieves near-CEX efficiency and depth, but its matching logic combines on-chain settlement and order book verification, increasing system complexity and reliance on risk control mechanisms. It requires a large HLP liquidity pool and complex risk control mechanisms, transferring extremely high risk control pressure to liquidity providers and the protocol itself. Aster: The liquidation mechanism is based on the principle of "reducing risk layer by layer". It improves capital efficiency and robustness during periods of low volatility through the "risk pooling" strategy, but at the cost of a more complex risk transmission path and extreme sensitivity to parameter settings. edgeX uses ZK-Rollup technology to ensure extremely high transparency and verifiability, reducing reliance on external insurance funds. However, this comes at the cost of performance limitations imposed by L2 data availability and state commit latency. The system needs to rely on redundancy mechanisms, verifiable playback, and robust monitoring to mitigate the impact of these risks on overall stability. Lighter: Under the "verifiable off-chain order book" architecture, auditability and on-chain trust are given priority, but at the cost of performance that cannot reach the upper limit of pure off-chain matching. Therefore, it is more suitable for users who prefer transparency, verifiability and lower systemic risk. Conclusion: Security Boundaries and Future Trends By 2025, Perp DEX's security boundary had transitioned from "smart contract security" to "system-level security." On-chain matching, oracle price sources, liquidation logic, risk parameters, LP liquidity pool exposure control, robustness of the market-making mechanism, and the integrity of cross-chain messages together constitute an interdependent security framework. Three major trends for the future: 1. Semi-automated risk control: On-chain mechanisms are insufficient to cope with complex attacks. In the future, a "semi-automated governance" system will be formed by combining off-chain real-time monitoring and dynamic parameter adjustment. 2. Compliance Integration: The hybrid model of "no custody required but subject to regulation" will become key to attracting institutional-grade liquidity. Verifiable KYC and compliant liquidity pools will become the new infrastructure. 3. Technology-driven expansion of security boundaries: Technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs, high-performance L2, and modular design will enable complex real-time risk models to run on the blockchain, elevating risk control capabilities to the level of financial infrastructure. The winners of the future will no longer be those who compete on transaction fees or depth, but rather those who can integrate technological security, financial engineering, and compliance frameworks.

Author: PANews

2025/12/05

Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP Draws $42M Inflows on Debut as LINK Volume Rises

Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP Draws $42M Inflows on Debut as LINK Volume Rises

The post Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP Draws $42M Inflows on Debut as LINK Volume Rises appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP, ticker GLNK, debuted with $42 million in day-one inflows, boosting total assets to $64 million amid a sluggish crypto market. This marks strong demand for regulated access to Chainlink’s LINK token through traditional brokerage accounts. Grayscale Chainlink ETP inflows reached $42 million on launch day, signaling robust investor interest despite broader market slowdowns. Trading volume for GLNK showed solid liquidity, with LINK’s price climbing over six percent and volume surging 180 percent. Institutional demand for Chainlink products is rising, as evidenced by GLNK’s $64 million in assets and the pending CLNK listing on DTCC, highlighting growth in staking and data services. Discover how Grayscale Chainlink ETP’s $42M debut inflows reflect surging interest in regulated crypto products. Explore LINK’s market surge and future access—stay informed on Chainlink’s role in tokenization today. What is the Performance of Grayscale’s Chainlink ETP on Its Debut? Grayscale Chainlink ETP launched strongly, attracting approximately $42 million in inflows on its first trading day, which elevated total assets under management to around $64 million. This performance occurred despite subdued conditions in the wider cryptocurrency market, underscoring investor enthusiasm for regulated exposure to Chainlink’s native LINK token. The exchange-traded product, listed on NYSE Arca under the ticker GLNK, provides a straightforward way for investors to gain access without managing wallets or private keys. How Does the Grayscale Chainlink ETP Enhance Access to LINK? The Grayscale Chainlink ETP simplifies investment in LINK by offering a regulated vehicle that integrates seamlessly with standard brokerage accounts, eliminating the complexities of direct cryptocurrency handling. According to Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart, the debut represented “a very good opening for a new launch,” especially given the market’s recent sluggishness over the past month. He emphasized that the $42 million inflows were “even more impressive” under current trading conditions, with strong volume…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/12/05

Grayscale Chainlink ETF Debut Shows Promise, May Boost LINK Toward $20

Grayscale Chainlink ETF Debut Shows Promise, May Boost LINK Toward $20

The post Grayscale Chainlink ETF Debut Shows Promise, May Boost LINK Toward $20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Grayscale’s spot Chainlink ETF launched on December 3, 2025, achieving $13 million in initial trading volume and $42 million in inflows, signaling strong institutional interest in the LINK token despite lower volume compared to Solana and XRP ETFs. Grayscale Chainlink Spot ETF Debut: The product marked Chainlink’s entry into U.S. spot ETFs with notable first-day performance. Analysts praised the launch, highlighting its success for longer-tail assets like LINK in the ETF space. LINK’s open interest rose from $194 million to $240 million post-launch, reflecting increased speculative and bullish sentiment in futures markets. Discover the Grayscale Chainlink Spot ETF’s strong debut with $42M inflows and market impact on LINK price. Explore analyst insights and growth potential in tokenized assets today. What is the Impact of Grayscale’s Chainlink Spot ETF Launch? Grayscale’s Chainlink Spot ETF represents a significant milestone for the decentralized oracle network, providing investors direct exposure to the LINK token through a regulated product. Launched on December 3, 2025, it recorded $13 million in trading volume on its first day, accompanied by $42 million in inflows, which outperformed expectations for a niche asset. This development underscores growing institutional adoption of altcoins beyond major players like Bitcoin and Ethereum. How Has the Chainlink ETF Affected LINK’s Market Performance? The debut of the Grayscale Chainlink Spot ETF has injected fresh momentum into the LINK market, with trading volume reaching $13 million on day one—lower than Solana’s $56 million and XRP’s $33 million but still indicative of solid demand. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas described it as “another insta-hit,” noting $41 million in first-day flows and emphasizing its early success in the crypto ETF landscape, except for underperformers like Dogecoin. James Seyffart, another Bloomberg analyst, called the volume “strong” and “impressive,” adding that it proves longer-tail assets can thrive in ETF wrappers. Grayscale…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/12/05

‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

The post ‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chainlink has officially joined the U.S. Spot ETF club, following Grayscale’s successful debut on the 3rd of December.  The product achieved $13 million in day-one trading volume, significantly lower than the Solana [SOL] and Ripple [XRP], which saw $56 million and $33 million during their respective launches.  However, the Grayscale spot Chainlink [LINK] ETF saw $42 million in inflows during the launch. Reacting to the performance, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it “another insta-hit.” “Also $41m in first day flows. Another insta-hit from the crypto world, only dud so far was Doge, but it’s still early.” Source: Bloomberg For his part, James Seyffart, another Bloomberg ETF analyst, said the debut volume was “strong” and “impressive.” He added,  “Chainlink showing that longer tail assets can find success in the ETF wrapper too.” The performance also meant broader market demand for LINK exposure, noted Peter Mintzberg, Grayscale CEO.  Impact on LINK markets Bitwise has also applied for a Spot LINK ETF and could receive the green light to trade soon. That said, LINK’s Open Interest (OI) surged from $194 million to nearly $240 million after the launch.  The surge indicated a surge in speculative interest for the token on the Futures market.  Source: Velo By extension, it also showed bullish sentiment following the debut. On the price charts, LINK rallied 8.6%, extending its weekly recovery to over 20% from around $12 to $15 before easing to $14.4 as of press time. It was still 47% down from the recent peak of $27.  The immediate overheads for bulls were $15 and $16, and clearing them could raise the odds for tagging $20. Especially if the ETF inflows extend.  Source: LINK/USDT, TradingView Assessing Chainlink’s growth Chainlink has grown over the years and has become the top decentralized oracle provider, offering numerous blockchain projects…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/12/05

Recommended by active authors

BitcoinEthereumNews
BitcoinEthereumNews
1781Articles
Cryptopolitan
Cryptopolitan
412Articles
Coinstats
Coinstats
314Articles
PANews
PANews
302Articles

Related Tags

#Brifge#Yield-Farming#Basis-Trading#Prediction-Market#Launchpad#Liquid-Staking#Lending#DePIN#RWA

Latest Articles

Trump debate adviser turns tables on president's 'disease': 'You caused this problem'

Trump debate adviser turns tables on president's 'disease': 'You caused this problem'

2026/02/04 21:34
Weekly Crypto Catch-up: Epstein, Trump, & Record Trading

Weekly Crypto Catch-up: Epstein, Trump, & Record Trading

2026/02/04 21:20
‘We’re in crypto winter’- Bitwise turns bearish as Bitcoin price slips below $75K

‘We’re in crypto winter’- Bitwise turns bearish as Bitcoin price slips below $75K

2026/02/04 21:19
The Role of Technology in Effective Decision Processes

The Role of Technology in Effective Decision Processes

2026/02/04 21:16
This dark history uncovers the roots of Trump's racist paramilitary police

This dark history uncovers the roots of Trump's racist paramilitary police

2026/02/04 20:53