ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvent Center
More
ICP Zero-Fee Gala

Oracle

Oracles are essential infrastructure components that feed real-time, off-chain data (such as price feeds, weather, or sports results) into blockchain smart contracts. Without decentralized oracles like Chainlink and Pyth, DeFi could not function. In 2026, oracles have evolved to support verifiable randomness and cross-chain data synchronization. This tag covers the technical evolution of data availability, tamper-proof price feeds, and the critical role oracles play in ensuring the deterministic execution of complex decentralized applications.

5120 Articles
Created: 2026/02/02 18:52
Updated: 2026/02/02 18:52
IOTA Network Shows Signs of Coordinated Architecture Linking Trade, Collateral, and Settlement

IOTA Network Shows Signs of Coordinated Architecture Linking Trade, Collateral, and Settlement

An IOTA enthusiast has noted that the recent integrations and developments on the IOTA network go beyond isolated components to a coordinated financial architecture.  Regardless of these developments, the price of IOTA has recorded declines across all the major trading sessions. In a recent update, CNF explained how IOTA is leading the creation of the [...]]]>

Author: Crypto News Flash

2025/11/17

Is the AI bubble about to burst? How can tech giants repeat the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis?

Is the AI bubble about to burst? How can tech giants repeat the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis?

Author: Bruce Introduction: The Hidden Shadows Beneath the AI Boom We are living in an exciting era, with the AI revolution permeating every corner of life at an astonishing pace, promising a more efficient and intelligent future. However, a worrying signal has recently emerged: OpenAI, one of the world's most prominent AI companies, has publicly requested federal loan guarantees from the US government to support its massive infrastructure expansion, which could cost over one trillion dollars. This is not just an astronomical figure, but a stark warning. If the financial blueprint supporting this AI boom bears a striking resemblance to the structure of the 2008 financial crisis, which nearly devastated the global economy over a decade ago, how should we interpret this? While the prospects of the AI industry and its potential for technological revolution are exciting, recent market activity has revealed unsettling signals of financial stress. The underlying structure of its capital operations bears a striking resemblance to several historical financial crises, particularly the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis. This article will delve into the capital cycles, leverage operations, and risk transfer issues behind these warning signs, penetrating the market narrative to stress-test the financial structure supporting current AI valuations. Ultimately, we will assess the nature of the risks, their potential outcomes, and propose investor strategies. Warning signs emerge: Early warning signals centered around Oracle In the current boom led by AI technology, market sentiment is generally optimistic, and the stock prices of tech giants are hitting new highs. However, just as experienced miners would take a canary down the mine to warn of toxic gases, in a seemingly bright market, abnormal financial indicators of individual companies can often become the "canary in the mine" that reveals potential systemic risks to the entire industry. The canary in the mine Oracle, a long-established tech giant, is making a high-stakes gamble. To challenge Amazon, Microsoft, and Google's dominance in the AI data center field, it is investing hundreds of billions of dollars in expansion at the cost of extremely high debt, including the "Stargate" super data center project in partnership with OpenAI. Its debt-to-equity ratio has reached a staggering 500%, meaning its total debt is five times its net assets. In comparison, Amazon's debt-to-equity ratio is only 50%, and Microsoft's is even lower. Simply put, Oracle is betting almost its entire fortune and even its future value in this AI race. Debt levels of US tech giants This alarm is known as Credit Default Swap (CDS). The most critical recent signal is the surge in CDS spreads—the premiums insured against the potential fire of Oracle's "debt default"—reaching their highest levels in years. We can think of a CDS as a form of financial insurance: Imagine your neighbor (Oracle) is constantly piling up flammable materials in his basement (mountains of debt). You're very worried that his house will catch fire, potentially affecting yours. So, you find an insurance company and buy fire insurance for your neighbor's house out of your own pocket. In the financial world, this insurance contract is a CDS, and the premium you pay is the price (spread) of the CDS. A surge in premiums means the insurance company believes the risk of fire has increased dramatically. This phenomenon sends a clear message: the market's top and most astute financial institutions generally believe that Oracle's default risk is rising sharply, rooted in the "mountain of debt, like dynamite," on its balance sheet. Oracle's debt alarm is like a small crack in the earth's surface, but it hints at violent tectonic shifts deep beneath. What structural risks are hidden within this capital operation model that drives the entire AI industry? Deep Financial Structure: The "Infinite Money Loop" Game Among AI Giants The financial pressure on a single company is merely the tip of the iceberg. When we broaden our perspective from Oracle to the entire AI ecosystem, a deeper, structural risk emerges. The real risk lies in a unique capital operation model among AI industry giants—a financial game that appears to be able to turn lead into gold, but is in fact extremely fragile. This is the closed-loop capital game known as the "infinite money cycle," which inflates revenue bubbles out of thin air, constructing a seemingly prosperous but ultimately vulnerable financial system. To understand this model more clearly, we can simplify it into a "three friends starting a business" model: Step 1: Chip giant Nvidia (Mr. A) invests $100 in AI star company OpenAI (Mr. B). Step 2: OpenAI (Mr. B) immediately paid the full 100 yuan to Oracle (Mr. C), ostensibly to purchase its expensive cloud computing services. Step 3: After receiving the 100 yuan, Oracle (Mr. C) quickly used it all to purchase powerful super chips from the original investor, Nvidia (Mr. A). Unlimited funds game After this cycle, the 100 yuan returned to Nvidia. However, although the funds were merely circulating internally without any actual purchases from external customers, the financial statements of the three companies all "magically" generated 100 yuan in revenue each. This made their financial reports exceptionally impressive, thus strongly supporting their high stock prices and market valuations. The fatal flaw of this model lies in the fact that the entire game is not built on solid customer demand, but rather relies entirely on the promises made by the participants and ever-expanding credit. Once any link in the cycle breaks—for example, if Oracle becomes unable to repay its loans due to excessive debt—the entire seemingly prosperous system could collapse instantly. This closed-loop capital cycle, which collectively inflates income bubbles through insider trading, is not a financial innovation; its structure bears a striking resemblance to certain pre-financial crisis practices, inevitably reminding us of that storm that nearly destroyed the global economy. Echoes of History: Five Striking Similarities Between the Current AI Financial Structure and the 2008 Subprime Crisis Current financial phenomena are not isolated. When we piece together Oracle's debt warnings with the capital cycles among AI giants, market observers who experienced the 2008 financial crisis will feel a sense of déjà vu. The following systematic analysis dissects five key commonalities between current financial operations in the AI field and the core elements that led to the 2008 global financial crisis, revealing that history may be repeating itself in a new form. Comparing the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis with the current AI bubble These five striking similarities paint a disturbing picture. However, history never simply repeats itself. Before we hastily equate the AI bubble with the subprime crisis, we must answer a core question: At the heart of this storm, are the "assets" used as collateral fundamentally different in nature? 2008 subprime mortgage crisis Key Difference Analysis: Why This Might Not Be a Simple Repeat of 2008 While the aforementioned similarities are alarming, it would be simplistic to equate the current AI wave with the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis. History may have its rhythms, but it doesn't simply repeat itself. Beneath the striking similarities lie three fundamental differences that could determine the ultimate trajectory and scope of this potential crisis. The core assets were fundamentally different: In 2008, the core assets were non-productive residential real estate. For the vast majority of homeowners, the property itself did not generate cash flow to repay the loan. The entire game was sustained by a fragile belief: "House prices will always rise." Once this belief was shattered, the entire credit chain collapsed. The core assets of AI today are productive data centers and GPUs. Data centers and GPUs are typical productive assets, veritable "golden geese." Their sole purpose is to generate direct cash flow by providing computing power services. Therefore, the key question has shifted from "whether asset prices will fall" to "whether the speed at which assets generate cash flow can outpace their financing and operating costs." This fundamental shift is the crucial dividing line that downgrades this potential crisis from a "systemic risk threatening the global banking system" to a "devastating internal reshuffling of the technology industry." The creditworthiness of the borrowers differed: In 2008, borrowers were subprime individuals. The powder keg that ignited the crisis consisted of individual borrowers with unstable incomes and extremely poor credit records, who lacked the genuine ability to repay their debts from the outset. Current AI lenders: Top tech companies. The current frenzy of lending in the AI field is primarily driven by the world's wealthiest and most profitable companies, such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Their debt repayment capabilities far surpass those of subprime borrowers of the past. The Difference in Regulatory Environments: We live in a "post-2008" world. Following that global crisis, the global financial regulatory system has been patched with a series of significant measures. Banks are required to hold more capital to address potential risks, and central banks and other regulatory bodies are now more inclined to "intervene proactively" rather than reacting reactively as they did back then. Based on the above three key differences, we can draw an important conclusion: even if the AI bubble eventually bursts, its outcome is unlikely to be a systemic financial crisis like the one that destroyed the global banking system in 2008. Instead, it is more likely to evolve into another famous crisis pattern in history: a "2000 dot-com bubble 2.0" for the technology industry. Risk Assessment and Outlook: Is this the "Dot-com Bubble 2.0 of 2000" for the tech industry? Based on the preceding analysis of the similarities and differences between the AI financial structure and the 2008 crisis, we can make a more accurate qualitative assessment and forecast of the potential risks in the current AI field. The conclusion is that if a crisis does occur, its pattern will be closer to the bursting of the dot-com bubble in 2000 than the global financial tsunami of 2008. Based on this assessment, the ultimate outcome of this potential crisis is more likely to be a crisis primarily confined to the technology industry. Once the bubble bursts, we may see a large number of AI companies relying on "stories" and debt collapse; tech stocks will experience a painful decline; and countless investors' wealth will vanish. The pain will be intense, but it is highly unlikely to drag the entire world down with it. Its impact is relatively limited because the risk is mainly concentrated on equity investors and the technology supply chain, rather than penetrating the balance sheets of the global banking system through complex financial derivatives as in 2008, thus avoiding a systemic credit freeze. Having clarified the nature of the risk and its possible outcomes, the most critical question for investors now is no longer "whether it will collapse," but rather "how to cope." Investor Response Strategy: Seeking Opportunities Amidst Vigilance Faced with a potential industry crisis, the core task for investors is not panic selling and exiting the market, but rather rational risk management and portfolio optimization. Now is not the time to run away, but rather to carefully prune the portfolio like a shrewd gardener. The following three specific and actionable strategies aim to help investors remain vigilant while protecting existing gains and positioning themselves for the future. Strategy 1: Review and categorize your AI stock holdings: First, you must clearly categorize the AI-related stocks you hold in order to assess their respective risk levels: Core players: such as Nvidia and Google. These companies have substantial financial resources, and their AI investments are primarily driven by their strong profits and cash flow, making them the most resilient participants. High-Risk Challengers: Such as Oracle. These companies attempt to "leapfrog" through massive borrowing, which may bring high returns, but they are also extremely vulnerable and are the most susceptible to potential crises. Investment Warning: For stocks like Oracle that have already experienced a round of "pump and dump," do not attempt to "buy the dip" until a new narrative emerges to support a higher valuation. The selling pressure from those who bought in earlier is enormous, making entry at this point extremely risky. Strategy Two: Think like a bank and "insure" your investment portfolio: Learn from the hedging strategies of smart financial institutions and "insure" your investment portfolio. For ordinary investors, the simplest and most effective hedging method is not complex options trading, but rather partial profit-taking. It's advisable to sell some of the stocks that have seen the largest gains, especially those high-risk stocks driven by "narratives," turning paper wealth into cash. This isn't a sign of pessimism about the long-term future of AI, but rather a mature investor's approach to protecting existing profits. Strategy 3: Diversify your investments and avoid putting all your eggs in one basket: It is recommended to reallocate some of the profits gained from AI stocks to more stable asset classes to diversify risk. Possible directions include more defensive assets such as high-dividend stocks, or traditional safe-haven assets such as gold and government bonds. For those seeking to maintain exposure to the technology sector while diversifying risk, broader, more comprehensive index tools such as the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) should be used instead of over-concentrating on a single high-risk stock. Conclusion: Standing at the crossroads of genuine innovation and financial illusion AI is undoubtedly a technological revolution that will profoundly change all of us—that much is certain. However, its current trajectory is supported by some fragile financial structures. This places us at a critical crossroads. The real question is: do we build this bright future on the foundation of genuine innovation and sound finances, or on a fragile sandcastle built from revolving credit and financial illusions? The answer to this question will not only determine the ultimate direction of this AI feast but will also profoundly impact the financial destiny of each and every one of us in the coming years. In summary, the AI industry is showing signs of debt-driven financial vulnerability, and its capital operation model bears disturbing similarities to historical financial bubbles. This necessitates an immediate shift in our investment strategy from "opportunity-driven" to "risk management-first." Remain vigilant, but do not panic. Our primary tasks now are to optimize portfolio structure, lock in realized profits, and comprehensively improve the quality and resilience of our holdings.

Author: PANews

2025/11/17

WLFI Success Signals XRP Tundra as Next Presidential Portfolio Pick

WLFI Success Signals XRP Tundra as Next Presidential Portfolio Pick

The post WLFI Success Signals XRP Tundra as Next Presidential Portfolio Pick appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. World Liberty Financial’s rapid expansion has captured national attention. The company raised $550 million through token sales, while its stablecoin USD1 became a global top-five asset. Meanwhile, the Trump Organization’s income surged dramatically from crypto ventures. WLFI’s governance token debut revealed sharp volatility that challenged politically aligned portfolios. Capital strength alone failed to ensure stability once assets began trading. This shift places more emphasis on infrastructure-focused ecosystems with detailed documentation and segmented token roles. Attention is shifting to the next “presidential portfolio” candidate.  XRP Tundra is emerging as a strong ecosystem. Investors see it matching key characteristics. They analyze it closely after WLFI’s high-profile performance. World Liberty Financial’s Rapid Expansion Highlights a Shift in Institutional Crypto Strategy World Liberty Financial demonstrates how aggressively large entities can scale when capital inflow is high. The enterprise raised $550 million through token sales.  It drove a 17-fold surge in Trump Organization income, with over 90% tied to crypto ventures. Its stablecoin, USD1, reached a market capitalization of $2.7 billion, becoming the world’s fifth-largest stablecoin. At the same time, the governance token WLFI experienced significant volatility. The token fell nearly 50% soon after trading opened in September 2025. This sharp drop sparked debate about how governance-first models perform under market pressure. Overwhelming fundraising success was followed by sharp post-launch corrections. Portfolio analysts revisited which assets best fit long-horizon, visibility-focused mandates. This broader discussion highlights ecosystems like XRP Tundra. They emphasize structural clarity and segmented functionality. They avoid relying solely on singular-token governance mechanics. Portfolio Composition Shows Clear Bias Toward Structured, High-Liquidity Assets A detailed look at World Liberty Financial’s disclosed holdings illustrates how institutional portfolios are constructed. The largest share, 33.73%, is allocated to Ethereum, worth about $27.32 million.  Ethereum’s dominant presence reflects its entrenched role in dApps, infrastructure development, and high-liquidity markets. Wrapped…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/17

Which Crypto to Buy Today for Short-Term? 90% MUTMs Are Sold and a 20% Price Move Is Evident

Which Crypto to Buy Today for Short-Term? 90% MUTMs Are Sold and a 20% Price Move Is Evident

Short-term crypto traders always look for clear signals that give them quick gains. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is catching attention now because the presale Phase 6 is almost sold out, the dashboard and leaderboard are live, and there is a clear upcoming price step. Traders are watching the 20% price move from $0.035 to $0.040 closely. [...]]]>

Author: Crypto News Flash

2025/11/16

Nvidia (NVDA) Stock: Can Q3 Earnings Wednesday Revive the Struggling AI Rally

Nvidia (NVDA) Stock: Can Q3 Earnings Wednesday Revive the Struggling AI Rally

TLDR Nvidia’s spring 2023 revenue forecast was nearly double Wall Street estimates, launching the AI investment boom that added $3.5 trillion to its market value Skepticism about AI investments has grown as Meta Platforms fell 20% after announcing increased AI spending plans and Nvidia dropped 8% since late October CEO Jensen Huang projects approximately $500 [...] The post Nvidia (NVDA) Stock: Can Q3 Earnings Wednesday Revive the Struggling AI Rally appeared first on CoinCentral.

Author: Coincentral

2025/11/16

The $0.035 Token That Could Challenge the Top 10 Cryptos by 2026

The $0.035 Token That Could Challenge the Top 10 Cryptos by 2026

A new wave of investors is looking for early-stage projects that could rise much faster than the major cryptocurrencies.

Author: Cryptodaily

2025/11/16

Chainlink Hits $322B in Tokenized RWAs as J.P. Morgan and Fidelity Expand Onchain Integrations

Chainlink Hits $322B in Tokenized RWAs as J.P. Morgan and Fidelity Expand Onchain Integrations

The post Chainlink Hits $322B in Tokenized RWAs as J.P. Morgan and Fidelity Expand Onchain Integrations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chainlink saw sharp growth in tokenized asset use as major institutions expanded on-chain efforts. LINK gained added functions through the Reserve launch and wider program rewards across markets. Chainlink recorded a major rise in tokenized asset activity, reaching $322.3 billion, according to a Messari report. That figure placed the network at the center of a fast-growing segment supported by major financial groups such as J.P. Morgan and Fidelity.  The shift from early single-chain tools toward a spread of multichain activity raised new expectations for shared standards. Institutions pursuing tokenized assets wanted consistent rules for data, execution, and privacy, and Chainlink expanded its suite in response.  Its stack now covers data feeds, data streams, SmartData, CCIP for cross-chain settlement, Automated Compliance Engine, privacy tools such as Confidential Compute and the Blockchain Privacy Manager, and the Chainlink Runtime Environment for secure workflow execution. Chainlink isn’t just powering price feeds anymore; it’s becoming the backbone of onchain finance. With $322B+ in tokenized RWAs and major institutions like J.P. Morgan, Fidelity, UBS, and Swift building on its stack, @chainlink is evolving into a full-stack platform for onchain… https://t.co/hjGtYlkSyE — Messari (@MessariCrypto) November 14, 2025 Institutional Adoption Strengthens Onchain Activity J.P. Morgan applied Chainlink capabilities through Kinexys for a cross-chain Delivery versus Payment process. Kinexys connected an interbank payment network with Ondo Chain, plus a tokenized U.S. Treasuries fund known as OUSG. The action showed cross-chain settlement across permissioned and public systems without disruptions. Fidelity International linked its Institutional Liquidity Fund with Chainlink for on-chain NAV distribution. Fund size stands at $6.9 billion. NAV information flows onto zkSync, enabling transparent fund-share tracking on-chain. Fidelity flagged real-time fund-data availability as a core benefit. Apex Group partnered with Chainlink to build a stablecoin structure using CCIP, ACE, and Proof of Reserve. The group continued adding Chainlink services…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/16

5 Top Cryptos to Join for Massive Gains – BlockchainFX Early AOFA License Gives It a Serious Advantage

5 Top Cryptos to Join for Massive Gains – BlockchainFX Early AOFA License Gives It a Serious Advantage

The post 5 Top Cryptos to Join for Massive Gains – BlockchainFX Early AOFA License Gives It a Serious Advantage appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Some crypto opportunities feel routine, and then there are moments when something entirely unexpected happens. This week, BlockchainFX ($BFX), Aster (ASTER), Ethereum (ETH), TRON (TRX), and Chainlink (LINK) are the top cryptos to join, but one of them is rewriting early-stage expectations from the ground up. BlockchainFX has just secured its official trading license from the Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority (AOFA), a milestone that most exchanges only achieve after years in operation. This positions BlockchainFX at the top of today’s list. With real traction, daily users, and a fast-rising presale, the project is already behaving like a future market leader instead of a newcomer. Investors looking for top cryptos to join immediately notice how far ahead BFX is compared to typical presales. 1. BlockchainFX: A Rare Licensed Presale With Explosive Early Strength BlockchainFX is accelerating quickly, raising $11.17M from 17,800+ investors and nearing its $12M soft cap. With the presale at $0.030 and a $0.05 launch price, early buyers are securing a strong entry before the next increase. What makes it stand out among today’s top cryptos to join is its newly approved AOFA trading license, a milestone most platforms achieve only after years, not before launch. The platform is already live in beta, allowing users to trade crypto, stocks, forex, ETFs, and commodities in one place. Audited smart contracts and transparent on-chain activity give it a level of maturity rarely seen in presales, with thousands of users actively testing its features daily. Why Investors Are Targeting BFX for High Returns At $0.030, a $20,000 investment yields 666,666 tokens. At launch, the same stack is worth $33,333. But if BFX reaches its widely discussed $1 post-launch prediction, that becomes $666,666. Analyst targets of $8–$10 long-term give early buyers the kind of upside rarely available in large-cap assets. The LICENSE50 bonus…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/16

Could Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Be the Next Big Crypto in 2026? Here’s What Investors Are Saying

Could Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Be the Next Big Crypto in 2026? Here’s What Investors Are Saying

More and more early investors are giving notice to a fresh crypto initiative that has been gaining momentum behind the scenes during the year 2025. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is in presale but its blistering development and steady increase in demand are beginning to pose a straightforward query: could this be among the finest crypto platforms […]

Author: Cryptopolitan

2025/11/16

Oracle, Palantir, and Super Micro Reach Oversold Territory as AI Valuation Fears Mount

Oracle, Palantir, and Super Micro Reach Oversold Territory as AI Valuation Fears Mount

The post Oracle, Palantir, and Super Micro Reach Oversold Territory as AI Valuation Fears Mount appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → Oversold tech stocks like Oracle, Palantir, and Super Micro Computer have hit RSI levels below 30, signaling deep selling pressure amid AI valuation concerns. This week’s drop pushed these S&P 500 names into territory unseen in months, offering potential buying opportunities for value investors. Oracle’s RSI at 24 highlights oversold status after a 6% weekly decline. Palantir faces valuation fears and short-seller attacks, yet shows strong defense sector growth. Super Micro Computer’s earnings miss led to a 30% November drop, with RSI under 27 indicating oversold conditions. Discover oversold tech stocks like Oracle, Palantir, and Super Micro Computer hitting low RSI levels. Explore investment insights and recovery potential in this analysis. Stay ahead with key market updates today. What Are the Most Oversold Tech Stocks This Week? Oversold tech stocks such as Oracle, Palantir, and Super Micro Computer have emerged as key focus areas following a sharp market sell-off in U.S. technology and AI sectors. These companies, tracked via the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the S&P 500, now show readings below 30, a classic indicator of oversold…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/16

Recommended by active authors

BitcoinEthereumNews
BitcoinEthereumNews
1783Articles
Cryptopolitan
Cryptopolitan
412Articles
Coinstats
Coinstats
314Articles
PANews
PANews
302Articles

Related Tags

#Brifge#Yield-Farming#Basis-Trading#Prediction-Market#Launchpad#Liquid-Staking#Lending#DePIN#RWA

Latest Articles

Trump will 'draw down 700' DHS officers in Minneapolis: Tom Homan

Trump will 'draw down 700' DHS officers in Minneapolis: Tom Homan

2026/02/04 22:37
U.S economist predicts the economy is only going to get worse in 2026

U.S economist predicts the economy is only going to get worse in 2026

2026/02/04 22:18
YMX Logistics Executives Named 2026 Food Logistics Rock Stars

YMX Logistics Executives Named 2026 Food Logistics Rock Stars

2026/02/04 22:15
Over 60% of crypto press releases linked to high-risk or scam projects: Report

Over 60% of crypto press releases linked to high-risk or scam projects: Report

2026/02/04 22:02
South Korean court hands crypto CEO Lee Jong-hwan 3-year sentence for price manipulation

South Korean court hands crypto CEO Lee Jong-hwan 3-year sentence for price manipulation

2026/02/04 21:55